Heaviest Smokers Face Greatest Risk of Death After Lung Cancer Diagnosis

	Tweet

It’s common knowledge that smoking raises risks of lung cancer. And yet researchers haven’t known whether continued smoking by lung cancer patients would increase the risk of the cancer’s spread.

Researchers at West Virginia University – studying the relationship between death rates from lung cancer and how much a person smoked – have found that smoking intensity in fact predicts how the disease will progress.

Patients who smoked two packs a day had a 58 percent higher risk of their lung cancers returning or spreading compared with nonsmoking patients.

Smoking intensity is one of only two factors found to predict lung-cancer mortality, according to the study published in the May issue of the journal Lung Cancer. The other factor is the stage of the cancer when diagnosed. Almost 350 patients with non-small cell lung cancer were studied.

Males older than age 60 were found to be the heaviest smokers at the time of diagnosis. Patients who smoked more than 61 packs a year had the greatest risk of their cancers recurring, and their survival times were shortest. They were 41 percent more likely to die from lung cancer than patients who smoked less.

“This study is important because lung cancer causes more deaths than any other type of cancer,” said lead investigator Nancy L. Guo, Ph.D., a researcher with the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center.

“Because five-year survival rates of patients with non-small cell lung cancer are only about 15 percent, it’s useful to know which patients are most likely to have their tumors come back,” she said. “Our study showed that those who smoked more than 61 packs a year are more likely to develop tumor recurrence and should be considered for more aggressive therapy.”

Chemotherapy drugs could be offered to prevent recurrence and spread of tumors, the authors said. And the heaviest smokers might also be targeted for measures to help them quit smoking.

Patients older than age 60 smoked, on average, 164 packs a year. Males smoked 189 packs a year compared with females’ average of 112.

Patients with stage 3 tumors smoked an average of 198 packs a year.

The study is titled “Impact and interactions between smoking and traditional prognostic factors in lung cancer progression.”

In addition to the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, the study also involved researchers from the WVU Department of Community Medicine.

Source: West Virginia University Health Sciences Center

RELATED STORIES:
PET imaging may improve lung cancer diagnosis   New radiation therapy could help in lung cancer   New lung cancer staging system revealed   Lung Cancer Cells Activate Inflammation to Induce Metastasis   Asian lung cancer patient survival exceeds Caucasians’ on multiple regimens   Tumor budding identified as predictor for unfavorable outcome in lung cancer   Simple blood test detects lung cancer before it’s too late   Red Wine May Lower Lung Cancer Risk   Genetic variations raise lung cancer risk for smokers and ex-smokers   Lung cancer killing more women in Europe   New genetic techniques to combat lung cancer   Elderly Dutch lung patients’ survival improved by new treatment options between 2003-2009   Early Diagnosis of Lung Cancer: Where Do We Stand?   Lung cancer patients need help to quit smoking   Micro-RNA determines malignancy of lung cancer   Early morning smokers have increased risk of lung and head and neck cancers   Iron and calcium may up risk of lung cancer   Lung Cancer Doesn’t Just Target Smokers   Pistachios May Reduce Lung Cancer Risk   Gene is Linked to Lung Cancer Development in Never Smokers   Mutation database helps personalized treatment of lung cancer   Passive Smoke in Workplace Increases Lung Cancer Risk

Comments

[ + Post Your Own ]

Now you're in the public comment zone. What follows is not Armenian Medical Network's stuff; it comes from other people and we don't vouch for it. A reminder: By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.

There are no comments for this entry yet. [ + Comment here + ]