Breast cancer risk after false-positive mammography results

False-positive mammograms could be an indicator of underlying pathology that could result in breast cancer, according to a study published April 5 in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

Screening mammography is associated with false-positive test results in disease-free women, and those women are usually referred back for routine screening after the initial diagnostic work-up does not reveal cancer. Suspicious findings on screenings leading to false-positives include asymmetric densities, skin thickening or retraction, tumor-like masses, recently retracted nipples or suspicious axillary lymph nodes. It is unknown if women whose mammographic screenings show these results have a higher long-term risk for breast cancer compared to women who initially test negative.

In order to determine if women who test false-positive after mammography screenings have a higher risk of developing breast cancer than those who test negative, My von Euler-Chelpin, Ph.D., in the department of public health at the University of Copenhagen and colleagues, gathered data from a long-standing population-based screening mammography program in Copenhagen, Denmark from 1991-2005. They evaluated the risk of breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ in women who had received false-positive test results between the ages of 50-69 . The age-adjusted relative risk of breast cancer for women who had tested false-positive for breast cancer was compared to women who had tested negative.

The researchers found that women who had tested negative for breast cancer had an absolute cancer rate of 339/100,000 person-years at risk, compared to women who tested false-positive, who had an absolute cancer rate of 583/100,000 person-years at risk. The relative risk of breast cancer in women with false-positive tests was statistically significantly higher than women who tested negative even at 6 or more years after the test. However, the researchers caution that “The excess breast cancer risk in women with false-positive tests may be attributable to misclassification of malignancies already present at the baseline assessment,” the authors write. Thus, new screening methods such as high-resolution ultrasound and stereotactic biopsy may result in more accurate diagnoses and fewer false positives on first screen.

False-positive mammograms have negative effects
Women who are told their mammogram shows a possible cancer that turns out to be a false alarm are likely to suffer anxiety for a long time, according to a new study.

“U.S. women who get a false-positive are more likely to come back for their next routine screen,” lead author Dr. Noel T. Brewer, of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, told Reuters Health. “On the face of it, this seems like a good thing, but scaring women for long periods of time to get them to screen again does not seem like the best approach.”

Brewer and colleagues conducted an analysis of 23 studies showing the effects of false-positive results of mammography on women. The studies involved a total of 313,967 women aged 40 and older.

Women who were given a false-positive mammogram result performed breast self-exams more frequently than other women, the investigators report in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

American women who had received false-positive results were more likely to return for routine screening, Canadian women were less likely, and European women were statistically uninfluenced by a false-positive result in their adherence to follow-up exams.

The authors also caution that the experience of a false-positive may cause anxiety, which may discourage women from attending regular screenings. However, the long-term excess risk of breast cancer in women who tested false-positive underscores the need for women to have regular screenings. “Based on the findings in this study, it may be beneficial to actively encourage women with false-positive tests to continue to attend regular screening.”

###

Annual Mammograms May Have More False-Positives
Getting screening mammograms every two years instead of annually reduces the chance of a false alarm, a new study shows.

The frequency of screening mammograms - and the appropriate age to begin them - has been debated since the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force in 2009 recommended that women routinely get screening mammograms every other year starting at age 50.

The task force says the decision to start regular, biennial mammograms before age 50 should be an individual choice based on each patient’s situation. Meanwhile, the American Cancer Society continues to recommend that women get mammograms every year beginning at age 40.

Researchers analyzed data from nearly 170,000 women who had their first screening mammogram at age 40 to 59 years and almost 4,500 women with invasive breast cancer. Information about the women and their mammograms came from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, funded by the National Cancer Institute.

Contact Info:

My von Euler-Chelpin, .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Ilse Vejborg, .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

###

Zachary Rathner
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
301-841-1286
Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Provided by ArmMed Media