Asian lung cancer patient survival exceeds Caucasians’ on multiple regimens

	Tweet

Asian non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients survive longer than Caucasians no matter how many drugs are given in a first-line setting, and the effect was apparent both before and after the introduction of targeted therapies in the early 2000s, according to research published in the June issue of the Journal of Thoracic Oncology.

“It is recognized Asian patients with a common type of lung cancer, the non-small cell type, have a better survival than Caucasian patients when treated with chemotherapy,” said Dr. Ross Soo, senior consultant in the Department of Haematology-Oncology at the National University Hospital in Singapore. “What wasn’t known previously was whether this effect was seen in patients given just one or a combination of drugs. Furthermore, the improved survival could have been due to the better chance of targeted therapy working in Asians.

“We analyzed studies published in the past 35 years in which chemotherapy was given to patients in the advanced stage,” Dr. Soo said. “We found Asian patients indeed had a longer survival and also a higher chance of tumor shrinkage regardless of the number of chemotherapy drugs given in the first-line setting. We also found Asian patients lived longer than Caucasian patients in the era both before and after the use of targeted therapy such as gefitinib and erlotinib. These findings may impact on the design and conduct of international lung cancer trials as more Asian countries are now participating in such studies.”

Researchers analyzed 191 randomized controlled trials published between 1975 and 2010 involving 48,369 patients (6,806 Asian and 41,563 white).

For all drug regimens across those 35 years, Asian patients experienced median overall survival (OS) of 10.1 months while white patients’ overall survival was 8.0 months. For monotherapy, the median OS was 9.9 months for Asians and 6.8 months for whites. For platinum-based doublets, median OS was 10.4 months for Asians and 8.6 months for whites. For combinations of three or more drugs, median OS was 9.4 months for Asians and 8.0 months for whites.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) gefitinib and erlotinib were introduced in many Asian countries in 2002, and their use was associated with an improvement in OS of Asian patients. In the pre-EGFR TKI years (up to and including 2001), median OS was 9.1 months for Asians and 7.3 months for whites; from 2002 onward that gap widened to 11.0 months for Asians and 8.9 months for whites.

In single-agent studies done since 2002, the median OS was significantly higher in Asian than in white studies: 11.8 vs. 7.1 months. It also was notably higher than the years prior to 2002, when OS was 8.9 months for Asian and 6.5 months for white patients.

In platinum doublets the median OS was 11.0 months for Asians and 9.5 months for whites; that compared with pre-2002 OS rates of 9.1 months for Asian and 7.6 months for white patients. For regimens of three drugs or more, post EGFR TKI-approval median OS was 9.5 months for Asians and 8.2 months for whites, compared with 9.3 and 7.6 months, respectively, before 2002.

“Ethnic differences in survival and response rate to chemotherapy exist and should be considered in clinical trial designs especially in the global context,” researchers wrote.

###

The study was supported by Singapore National Research Foundation and the Ministry of Education under the Research Center of Excellence Programme.

About the Journal of Thoracic Oncology:

The Journal of Thoracic Oncology (JTO) is the official monthly journal of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC). It is a prized resource for medical specialists and scientists who focus on the detection, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. It emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, including original research (clinical trials and translational or basic research), reviews and opinion pieces.

About the IASLC:

The Denver-based International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) is the only global organization dedicated to the study of lung cancer. Founded in 1972, the association’s membership includes more than 3,000 lung cancer specialists in 80 countries.

IASLC members promote the study of etiology, epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, treatment and all other aspects of lung cancer and thoracic malignancies. IASLC disseminates information about lung cancer to scientists, members of the medical community and the public, and uses all available means to eliminate lung cancer as a health threat for the individual patients and throughout the world. Membership is open to any physician, health professional or scientist interested in lung cancer.

RELATED STORIES:
Gene combination increases risk of lung cancer, particularly in light smokers, CAMH study finds   Genetic mutation associated with increased risk of lung cancer   New lung cancer research finds half of advanced lung cancer patients receive chemotherapy   Reduced lung function tied to lung cancer risk   Lung cancer screen: a license to smoke?   Cheek Scrapings Can Detect Lung Cancer   Molecular subtypes and genetic alterations may determine response to lung cancer therapy   Nutrients may be why some smokers avoid cancer   Study Helps Explain Why Black Patients with Lung Cancer Have Surgery Less Often than Whites   Personalized treatment for early lung cancer   Tooth Loss Linked to Esophageal, Head and Neck, and Lung Cancer   New lung cancer test predicts survival   Long-Term Use of Nutrient Supplements May Increase Cancer Risk   Psychiatric symptoms can be first sign of cancer   Micro-RNA determines malignancy of lung cancer   Eating a variety of fruit cuts lung cancer risk   Lung Cancer Screening Encouraged for Smokers with History of the Disease   Latest research confirms genetic susceptibility to lung cancer   Ovary removal may raise risk of lung cancer   Lung Cancer Experts Address Smoking Dangers on Kick Butts Day   Plant product may help prevent lung cancer   Gene test helps predict lung cancer, study finds

Comments

[ + Post Your Own ]

Now you're in the public comment zone. What follows is not Armenian Medical Network's stuff; it comes from other people and we don't vouch for it. A reminder: By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.

There are no comments for this entry yet. [ + Comment here + ]