Health news
Health news top Health news

   Login  |  Register    
Health News Make AMN Your Home PageDiscussion BoardsAdvanced Search ToolMedical RSS/XML News FeedHealth news
  You are here : Health.am > Health Centers > Cancer Health CenterCancer news • • Colon & Colorectal Cancer news

Not all doctors follow cancer screening guidelines

Cancer news • • Colon & Colorectal Cancer newsOct 14, 2010

New study highlights need to address both the overuse and underuse of recommended colorectal cancer screening tests

Only one-fifth of primary care physicians in the US follow practice guidelines for colorectal cancer screening for all the tests they recommend, according to Dr. Robin Yabroff from the National Cancer Institute and her colleagues. About 40 percent followed guidelines for some of the tests they recommended and the remaining 40 percent did not follow guidelines for any of the screening tests they recommended. Furthermore, their analysis (1) of physician screening recommendations for colorectal cancer shows that many clinicians either overuse or underuse screening. Their findings appear online in the Journal of General Internal Medicine (2), published by Springer.

The theory goes that having multiple options for screening allows physicians and patients to consider the risks, benefits and other attributes of colorectal cancer screening tests* to identify the option best suited to the patient. In reality, however, many adults in the US do not receive appropriate colorectal cancer screening.

To learn about colorectal cancer screening practice in the US, the authors surveyed 1,266 physicians who took part in a national survey conducted by the National Cancer Institute.

Although most physicians made guideline-consistent recommendations for initiating screening in average risk patients at age 50 and for screening intervals for individual tests, few (19 percent) made guideline-consistent recommendations for both screening initiation and screening intervals across all screening tests that they recommended. Those whose recommendations were guideline consistent tended to be younger and board certified. They were also more likely to use electronic medical records, take patients’ screening preferences into account and be influenced by published clinical evidence.

Colonoscopy was the modality for which the highest proportion of physicians recommended screening more frequently than guidelines specify. It is also the most expensive colorectal screening method and the most commonly recommended. Overuse of screening may result in unnecessary follow-up testing for patients and increased risk of screening complications.

Some physicians recommended initiating screening in patients older than age 50 or at longer intervals than specified in the guidelines. Underuse of screening results in fewer earlier stage or pre-invasive cancers being detected.

Dr. Yabroff concludes: “Efforts to improve colorectal cancer screening practice should focus on factors that influence both overuse and underuse of screening and consider all recommended colorectal cancer screening modalities.”

*Screening options include: fecal occult blood testing, flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, and double contrast barium enema.

Reference
1. Yabroff KR et al (2010). Are physicians’ recommendations for colorectal cancer screening guideline-consistent? Journal of General Internal Medicine; DOI 10.1007/s11606-010-1516-5
2. The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine.

* Journal of General Internal Medicine

Contact: Joan Robinson

Provided by ArmMed Media

Email this to a friend Bookmark this! Printable Version

RELATED STORIES:


 Comments [ + Post Your Own

Now you're in the public comment zone. What follows is not Armenian Medical Network's stuff; it comes from other people and we don't vouch for it. A reminder: By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.

There are no comments for this entry yet. [ + Comment here + ]




We are pleased to let readers post comments about an article. Please increase the credibility of your post by including your full name and email.

All comments are reviewed by our editors before they are posted on the site. Just keep it clean, kids.

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:


   [advanced search]   
Interactive Quiz:
1. An infant who sits with only minimal support, attempts to attain a toy beyond reach, and rolls over from the supine to the prone position, but does not have a pincer grasp, is at a developmental level of
2 months
4 months
6 months
9 months
1 year



Health Centers

  Head and Neck Cancer

  Esophageal Cancer

  Benign Esophageal Tumors

  Cancer of the larynx

  Salivary Gland Tumors

  Cancer of the Hypopharynx

  Cancer of the Oropharynx

  Cancer of the Oral Cavity

  Cancer of the Nasal Cavity

  Head and Neck Cancer
      (- for profesionals -)


  Gynecologic cancers

  Cervical cancer

  Endometrial Cancer

  Fallopian Tube Cancer

  Ovarian Cancer

  Vaginal cancer

  Vulvar Cancer

  Ureteral & Renal Pelvic
  Cancers


  Uterine Cancer

  Gestational Trophoblastic
  Neoplasia


  Bladder cancer

  Breast cancer

  Colorectal Cancer

  Carcinoma of the Anus

  Anal Cancer Management

  Hodgkin's lymphoma

  Kaposi's sarcoma

  Kidney cancer

  Laryngeal cancer

  Liver cancer

  Lung cancer

  Lung cancer non small cell

  Lung cancer - small cell

  Oral cancer

  Osteosarcoma

  Cancer of the Penis

  Prostate cancer

  Skin cancer

  Stomach cancer

  Testicular cancer

» » »

Health Centers





Diabetes









Health news
  


Health Encyclopedia

Diseases & Conditions

Drugs & Medications

Health Tools

Health Tools



   Health newsletter

  





   Medical Links



   RSS/XML News Feed



   Feedback






Add to Google Reader or Homepage
Cancer: Overview, Causes, Risk Factors, Treatment
Add to My AOL




Urology Problems and Information: Doctor-Reviewed Articles at UrologyToday.net