Few people are doing it, so why should I? Motivating men to seek cancer screening

	Tweet

In Germany, several national health campaigns promote cancer screening by announcing that only one in five German men gets screened. This is supposed to motivate men to have an examination. But a new study published in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, finds that this well-meaning message has the exact opposite effect: it makes men less likely to choose to get screened.

In an earlier study, Monika Sieverding of the University of Heidelberg and her colleagues (Uwe Matterne and Liborio Ciccarello) had found that men who had never been screened for cancer thought that most other men weren’t getting screened, either. But Sieverding wanted to know if these men’s beliefs about screening rates influenced whether they decided to have cancer screening.

The researchers approached men in the pedestrian areas of two large German cities. They chose men who were 45 or older and had never been screened for cancer. (In Germany, the basic screening for men includes a prostate cancer exam and often also a blood test for colorectal cancer.) The men read one of two statements about cancer screening. One stated that only 18 percent of German men had been screened for cancer in the last year ("low-prevalence" group); the other said that already 65 percent of men had been screened ("high-prevalence" group). Both of these statements were true. The first was only about a one-year time period, while the second is the percentage of men who had ever been tested in their lifetime. Then the men were asked if they intended to have cancer screening in the next 12 months. 

Men in the high-prevalence group were much more likely to indicate that they would have cancer screening in the next year than those in the low-prevalence group. Additionally, men in the low-prevalence group were less likely to provide their name and address to receive further information about cancer screening by mail, thus indicating that low-prevalence information may actually have a demotivating effect.

“For us it is so interesting because this is very easy to change,” says Sieverding, who co-wrote the article with Sarah Decker and Friederike Zimmermann, all of the University of Heidelberg. “There are so many barriers to cancer screening. You cannot change attitudes easily, or the image of the average cancer screening patient, but it is easy to change the framing of the campaign.” Health campaigns could easily be designed to make people think that most other people are doing this behavior, so you should, too – whether it’s cancer screening, vaccinations, or washing your hands.

###

For more information about this study, please contact: Monika Sieverding

Psychological Science is ranked among the top 10 general psychology journals for impact by the Institute for Scientific Information. For a copy of the article “Information About Low Participation in Cancer Screening Demotivates Other People” and access to other Psychological Science research findings, please contact Keri Chiodo at 202-293-9300 or .

Contact: Keri Chiodo

202-293-9300
Association for Psychological Science

RELATED STORIES:
Tumor mechanism identified   Using PET/CT Imaging, Researchers Can Tell After a Single Treatment Whether Chemotherapy is Working   New Tool to Detect Cancer   Scientist Finds First Evidence Of Alcohol-Cancer Link   Excess body weight causes over 124,000 new cancers a year in Europe   Cell-Death Receptor Links Cancer Susceptibility and Inflammation   Nicotine promotes growth of established tumors   Gene Therapy Improves Survival and Quality of Life of Dogs with Cancer   Scientists detect cancer genes with new algorithm   Europe varies widely in at-home cancer deaths   Homeopathic Meds Can Coexist With Conventional Cancer Treatment   Oncologists are critical in managing psychiatric disorders in patients with advanced cancer   Researchers identify potential new avenue to attack cancer   Life after chemotherapy: Daily tasks, quality of life may be affected, MU researcher finds   Cancer risk slightly higher in IVF kids: study   Electric fields have potential as a cancer treatment   New Therapeutic Target for Melanoma Identified   Research Reveals What Drives Lung Cancer’s Spread   Scientists identify a new gene that causes the spread of cancer   Metastasis formation revealed in detail and real time   Nerve chemical may signal aggressive cancer   Clinical Trial Test Helps Measure Effectiveness of Treatment for Patients with Metastatic Cancer

Comments

[ + Post Your Own ]

Now you're in the public comment zone. What follows is not Armenian Medical Network's stuff; it comes from other people and we don't vouch for it. A reminder: By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.

There are no comments for this entry yet. [ + Comment here + ]