Irregular Bleeding Pattern as adverse effect of Hormonal contraception

	Tweet

Irregularity in menstrual pattern is the most common clinical side-effect of hormonal contraceptives.  Therefore, an objective assessment of cycle control is critical in evaluation of a new contraceptive method for its acceptance and continuation. Bleeding patterns are more predictable in users of combined injectables.

Progestin-only oral contraceptives may cause increased days of menstrual bleeding as subdermal progestin implants while combined pills may cause a decrease in days of bleeding. The use of copper IUDs is associated with increased bleeding in 18-20% of users during the initial period of three months which improves with prolonged use while levonorgestrel-releasing devices significantly, decreased bleeding ⁽¹⁾.  However, most these disorders are not clinically significant, they can lead to erratic method use or even to discontinuation⁽²⁾.

Early and/or late withdrawal bleeding and irregular bleeding (spotting and breakthrough bleeding) occurred more frequently in women taking COCs containing very low-dose EE(15 mcg) than in those using COCs containing 20 mcg EE⁽³⁾.  Although vaginal ring(EE15 μg/etonogestrel 120 μg) users reported significant better cycle control than oral contraceptives containing 15, 20 or 30 mcg EE ^(4,5,6).

In Milson study, breakthrough bleeding and spotting result less frequent with the vaginal ring than with the oral contraceptive containing EE 30mcg (4.7-10.4%) and intended bleeding was significantly better for all cycles with NuvaRing (68.5-56.6%) ^(7,8).  A preliminary study reported more high acceptability in ring than in patch users ⁽⁹⁾.  Good cycle control was, generally reported in combined HC containing EE 30mcg ^(10,11,12). 

However, the comparison between an oral contraceptive containing 20 microg ethinylestradiol and 75 microg gestodene, with a reference preparation containing 30 microg ethinylestradiol combined with 75 microg gestodene too, demonstrated that the two regimens had no difference in cycle control, efficacy, and side-effects. The occurrence of spotting and breakthrough bleeding was low and was not different between these two preparations⁽¹³⁾.

Adverse Effects of Hormonal contraception Moderate adverse effects Cardiovascular Effects Other Effects Cancer Risks Contraception in women HIV infected Mild Adverse effects - Irregular Bleeding Pattern - Ovarian cysts - Depression - Low Libido - Vaginal Infections New Perspectives immunocontraception - PMRS and PAS Contraceptive counseling Conclusion

It was reported that the long-acting progestogen –only contraceptives like levonorgestrel(LNG)- releasing subdermal implants, Norplant or intrauterine devices(LNG-IUD) as well as injectable contraceptive NET-EN 200mg given 2 or 3 monthly, produced disturbances in bleeding pattern in the majority of their users. Combined injectable contraceptives containing 50mg NET EN and 5 mg estradiol valerate caused less bleeding problems with half of the users experiencing normal pattern during one year of its use ^(14,15). 

Combined low-dose pill, both triphasic and monophasic, produce much better cycle control and almost 90% of users have normal bleeding patterns during one year of method use. In spite of supposed advantages of triphasic pill, randomized prospective studies on triphasic versus monophasic formulation no reported significant differences in effectiveness, bleeding patterns or discontinuation rates⁽¹⁶⁾.  The biphasic pill compared to triphasic pill seems to have an increase of breakthrough bleeding but the choice of progestin may be more important that the phasic regimen in determining bleeding patterns ⁽¹⁷⁾.

Yet, considering biphasic pill versus monophasic pill, extensive evidence is available for monophasic pill. Therfore, it is advisable to prefer the monophasic formulation ⁽¹⁸⁾. Progestogen-only(3-ketodesogestrel) contraceptive implant (Implanon) induce variable bleeding pattern and is characterized by relatively few bleeding events resulting acceptable to most subjects ⁽¹⁹⁾. When long-acting implants, injectables or hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems are prescribed, women should be informed of irregular bleeding and following amenorrhoea prior to starting the method choosed⁽²⁰⁾.

A study has evaluated the effectiveness on cycle control of two formulations low-dose EE combined with drospirenone 3mg or desogestrel 150 mcg and showed that it is comparable between both groups as frequency of withdrawal bleeding without negative effects on tolerability⁽²¹⁾. 

RELATED STORIES:
Contraceptive counseling   Progesterone Receptor Modulators (PMRS) and Progesterone Antagonists (PAS)   Conclusion - adverse effects of Hormonal contraception   New Perspectives immunocontraception   Low Libido as adverse effect of Hormonal contraception   Vaginal Infections as adverse effect of Hormonal contraception   Depression as adverse effect of Hormonal contraception   Ovarian cysts as adverse effect of Hormonal contraception   Mild Adverse effects of Hormonal contraception   Dermatological Adverse effects   Headache as Adverse Effect of Hormonal contraception   Adverse effects on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism   Moderate adverse effects hepatobiliary complications   Hormonal contraception in female heart transplant recipients   Contraception in women HIV infected

Comments

[ + Post Your Own ]

Now you're in the public comment zone. What follows is not Armenian Medical Network's stuff; it comes from other people and we don't vouch for it. A reminder: By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.

There are no comments for this entry yet. [ + Comment here + ]