Planned c-sections not for preterm pregnancies

	Tweet

New research suggests that elective c-sections should not be performed in pregnant women until they have reached full term. Performing the operation too early in pregnancy increases the risk of complications and even death for the new born, according to a report in the journal Pediatrics.

“A cesarean section can save the life of the mother and child, but this does not mean that it is safer than vaginal delivery and even attempted vaginal delivery,” Dr. Riccardo Erennio Pfister from University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland told Reuters Health. “Vaginal delivery is a desirable event” for the newborn, he added.

Pfister and colleagues investigated newborn complications associated with elective c-section and planned vaginal delivery in nearly 60,000 late-preterm and term infants. 

Neonatal death rates were 0.57 percent after elective c-section and 0.10 percent after planned vaginal delivery, the authors report.

Compared with planned vaginal delivery, elective c-section was associated with increased death rates in the full-term group but not in the late-preterm group, the authors report. They add that mortality rates after elective c-section were similar to rates after emergency c-section.

Depression at birth was slightly less frequent after elective c-section in the term group, but more frequent after elective c-section in the late-preterm group, compared to the planned vaginal delivery group.

Special care admissions were more frequent after elective c-section than after planned vaginal delivery, with “the risk of admission decreasing with increasing gestational age,” the researchers said.

Breathing complications were twice as common after elective c-section than after planned vaginal delivery, in both the term babies and late-preterm babies.

Pfister maintains that elective caesarian delivery “should be reserved for conditions that have been tested by (studies) to reduce a specific risk,” such a breech presentation at term. He points out, however, that “the maternal/neonatal outcomes depend on the level of care of this intervention and may not be automatically applied to any facility or country.”

“As elective cesarean is convenient for the medical team and patient in different terms (agenda, workload, financial) and furthermore protects the medical team from legal suits arising from pregnancy complications...there is little incentive to favor vaginal delivery,” Pfister continued. “Medical teams need objective data and legal protection from governments based on such data to support vaginal delivery and reduce elective cesarean (delivery).”

SOURCE: Pediatrics, June 2009.

RELATED STORIES:
Pill Among Least Effective Birth Control Methods   70 percent of women use contraceptives during their first sexual encounter   Long-term contraception more effective than pills   Gay couples and women over 40 to get free IVF treatment on NHS   Health secretary urges contraception compromise   Contraceptive ring, patch carry blood clot risks   Reminder Stamp Boosts HPV Vaccination   Study adds to evidence on clot risks of non-oral contraceptives   HPV vaccine completion rate among girls is poor, getting worse   Some ob-gyns cite religious conflicts over care   After IVF, some couples get pregnant without help   Web Tool Offers Map to Menopause   Early Menopause Could Also Mean Early Death   Does soy help cool hot flashes after all?   Caffeine not tied to worsening urinary incontinence

Comments

[ + Post Your Own ]

Now you're in the public comment zone. What follows is not Armenian Medical Network's stuff; it comes from other people and we don't vouch for it. A reminder: By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.

There are no comments for this entry yet. [ + Comment here + ]