Program seen helpful in heart patients: report

	Tweet

A patient-centered program of telephone support, close monitoring and tight control of modifiable risk factors such as High Blood Pressure and cholesterol levels results in a significant improvement in “risk profiles” among survivors of heart attack and other acute heart “events,” research shows.

The CHOICE program, which stands for Choice of Health Options In prevention of Cardiovascular Events, was developed by Dr. Julie Redfern and colleagues at Concord Hospital in New South Wales, Australia. Their study involved 144 ACS survivors who were not accessing standard cardiac rehabilitation.

“CHOICE is an effective alternative for dealing with the widespread underuse of existing secondary prevention programs,” the researchers conclude in the journal Heart.

Redfern and colleagues randomized study participants to the CHOICE program or to a control group who received conventional follow-up care but no coordinated “secondary” prevention. The researchers also measured outcomes of 64 ACS survivors who participated in standard cardiac rehabilitation.

The CHOICE program consists of telephone support, patient-tailored risk factor modification and one office visit. All patients took action to lower their cholesterol levels, but could choose to participate in blood pressure reduction, smoking cessation or exercise activities.

At 1 year, average total cholesterol levels were lower in the CHOICE group compared with the control group. Blood pressure readings were also lower in the CHOICE program participants.

Furthermore, only 21 percent of CHOICE participants had three or more risk factors above recommended levels compared with 72 percent of controls. Patients in the CHOICE program also had a better knowledge of risk factor targets than controls, and their physical activity level was almost twice as high as in controls.

“We believe the success was due to the patients having an active choice regarding how they would manage their risk factors, the individual attention the patients received, as well as the components of CHOICE,” Redfern told Reuters Health.

“We now have further research funding and are running an ‘implementation trial’ at four hospitals in Sydney. This is a great step forward and is the next step towards more widespread implementation. We are also following (these patients) for 4 years and will test whether 12 months of telephone follow-up is better than 3 months.”

SOURCE: Heart, March 2009.

RELATED STORIES:
Scientists turn skin cells into beating heart muscle   Too many people get angioplasties, study suggests   New Blood Thinner May Lower Chances of Clots in High-Risk Heart Patients: FDA   Heart Damage After Chemo Linked to Stress in Cardiac Cells   What’s good or bad for the heart, may be the same for the brain   Warfarin in Heart Failure   Increased Sudden Cardiac Death Rate Among HIV Patients   Air pollution level changes in Beijing linked with biomarkers of cardiovascular disease   Lack of basic evidence hampering prevention of sudden heart attacks in sport   Blacks Less Likely to Get Help on Scene After Cardiac Arrest: Study   Heart attack patients taken to PCI hospitals first treated faster   Cameron Health’s under-skin ICD safe, effective

Comments

[ + Post Your Own ]

Now you're in the public comment zone. What follows is not Armenian Medical Network's stuff; it comes from other people and we don't vouch for it. A reminder: By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.

There are no comments for this entry yet. [ + Comment here + ]