World health officials debate new tobacco controls

	Tweet

Health officials from across the world gathered on Monday in Uruguay to discuss tighter controls on tobacco that are rejected by farmers and the cigarette industry.

The World Health Organization meeting comes as the South American country fights a complaint filed by global tobacco company Philip Morris International, which says tough Uruguayan anti-smoking laws are hurting its business.

A total of 171 countries have signed the Framework Convention for Tobacco Control and delegates at this week’s gathering will analyze proposals to limit the use of additives in cigarettes. The global public health treaty addresses tobacco industry marketing and cigarette smuggling.

Supporters of a ban on tobacco additives say the substances improve the flavor of cigarettes, encouraging consumers to smoke more. Other issues on the table include proposals for tobacco companies to disclose more about their products and a gradual reduction in tobacco farming.

Tobacco growers’ groups say such measures would strip some 3.6 million African farmers of their livelihoods.

“If these WHO directives are adopted, some of Africa’s poorest countries, which depend on tobacco, are going to face a major social and economic crisis,” Antonio Abrunhosa, head of the International Tobacco Growers Association, said in the run-up to the meeting.

Argentina’s Nobleza Piccardo, part of British American Tobacco, said some of the recommendations lack “sufficient scientific evidence about any impact they might have on public health.”

VANGUARD

Uruguay has been at the vanguard of anti-smoking laws.

Former President Tabare Vazquez, an oncologist, banned smoking in public buildings four years ago. Tobacco advertising and the sale of products branded as “light” are banned, and cigarette packets must carry large, jarring health warnings.

Such rules drew the ire of Philip Morris, which earlier this year filed for arbitration at the World Bank’s International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes.

Philip Morris said it supported many of the Uruguayan measures, but disputed several regulations including an increase in the size of health warnings and a rule that limits the number of brands any one company can sell.

“Our ... claim only challenges three regulations implemented in 2009 by the former administration that go far beyond public health objectives,” the company said.

Its complaint is based on a trade deal between Uruguay and Switzerland, where the tobacco company is based.

Uruguayan President Jose Mujica on Monday lambasted the multinational firm for “using the courts to complicate the life and sovereignty of a small nation that has had the audacity to try to defend its people’s health.”

###

By Conrado Hornos

PUNTA DEL ESTE, Uruguay

RELATED STORIES:
Economic woes accelerate Medicaid spending   Argentina’s senate votes for “dignified death” law   Quitting smoking causes quick drop in inflammation   Vietnamese relatives have bird flu, no symptoms   Smokers’ brain power declines faster with age   Secondhand smoke permeates many apartment buildings   Ivory Coast polio outbreak could spread abroad: WHO   Estimated Costs of Environmental Disease in Children at $76.6 Billion Per Year   Unbelievable - three die from tuberculosis in the UK   Obama administration fights for stem cell funding   California voters back $3 billion stem cell measure   Scottish smoking ban hits pub drink sales -survey

Comments

[ + Post Your Own ]

Now you're in the public comment zone. What follows is not Armenian Medical Network's stuff; it comes from other people and we don't vouch for it. A reminder: By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.

Sounds good posture taken by Uruguay and it is clear that these companies have desarrrollados their markets based on the work of poor people who do not win you have to win and above is used as blackmail when they threaten the interests of your business. The states must choose the economic course of a nation and not companies. In addition the state must protect the health of its people and put it over the economic interests of businesses.

posted by Julio-Debate on 08/16/2011 at 2:40 pm -08:00