US asbestos bill debut delayed by silica issue
|
Tweet
|
|
The chief sponsor of a measure to compensate asbestos victims said on Tuesday its introduction had been delayed for a week while senators discuss how to handle claims of injury by another mineral, silica.
Pennsylvania Republican Sen. Arlen Specter, chairman of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, told reporters the panel would hold a hearing Feb. 2 to try to establish medical criteria for silica claims.
Specter had planned to introduce this week his proposal to take asbestos claims out of the courts and compensate them from a $140 billion privately funded trust instead.
But he said the ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, Vermont’s Sen. Patrick Leahy, asked him to delay the introduction while they worked on some of the language.
“We’ve got a problem on mixed dust,” Specter said. “The issue is, if you have a trust fund to pay all people from asbestos, and then some of the cases are allegedly being repackaged as silica cases, it’s not solving the problem.”
They should work out medical criteria for injuries caused by each mineral so as not to compensate people twice, he said.
Asbestos, a fire-retardant mineral, was once widely used for insulation and construction purposes. Scientists say inhaled fibers are linked to cancer and other diseases.
In recent years an explosion of asbestos injury claims have clogged U.S. courts and bankrupted dozens of companies.
Manufacturers have urged senators to write the trust fund law so lawyers could not repackage asbestos claims into claims involving other airborne fibers like silica.
But Sen. Leahy said on Tuesday he was concerned that some “last-minute” provisions in the bill would impair the legal rights of victims of other airborne minerals in the workplace.
“My two grandfathers worked as stonecutters in the granite quarries of Vermont and both suffered from silicosis because of their workplace exposures to stone dust,” Leahy said in a statement. “One of my grandfathers died at the age of 35 because of that exposure.
“Asbestos legislation should focus on compensating asbestos victims and not denying the legal rights of victims of other airborne dust, fiber or other minerals,” Leahy said.
Revision date: July 3, 2011
Last revised: by Janet A. Staessen, MD, PhD
| RELATED STORIES: | ||
| Comments | [ + Post Your Own ] |
Now you're in the public comment zone. What follows is not Armenian Medical Network's stuff; it comes from other people and we don't vouch for it. A reminder: By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
There are no comments for this entry yet. [ + Comment here + ]
We are pleased to let readers post comments about an article. Please increase the credibility of your post by including your full name and email.
All comments are reviewed by our editors before they are posted on the site. Just keep it clean, kids.
- Full Story - - »»»
Best time for a coffee break? There’s an app for that
- Full Story - - »»»
Cellphone Use Linked to Selfish Behavior in UMD Study
- Full Story - - »»»
Optimism about heart risks may be a good thing
- Full Story - - »»»
New guidelines developed for improved DVT diagnosis
- Full Story - - »»»
Teen pregnancy, abortion rates at record low, study says
- Full Story - - »»»
Think you can’t get pregnant? Try again, study says
- Full Story - - »»»

