Those in true emergency hardest hit by ER crisis

The state of US emergency departments has been called a “growing national crisis,” and a report out today shows the situation is only getting worse.

“Most distressingly,” the people who need emergency care the most are the least likely to be getting it in time, Drs. Leora I. Horwitz and Elizabeth H. Bradley of Yale University School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut, say.

Over half of patients deemed to need emergency care—meaning they should see a doctor in 14 minutes or less—actually saw a physician in this time frame, Horwitz and Bradley found.

To investigate trends in wait times, the researchers looked at data representing nearly 540 million ED visits in the US between 1997 and 2006. They analyzed how often patients in each triage category were seen within the recommended time. “Triage,” a term borrowed from military medicine, means ranking patients based on how soon they need to receive medical care.

“Emergent” patients must be seen within 14 minutes, while “urgent” patients require care in 15 to 60 minutes. “Semi-urgent” patients should receive care within two hours, while “non-urgent” patients can wait longer.

In 1997, the researchers found, 59 percent of emergent patients were seen within 14 minutes, compared to 48 percent in 2006. For urgent patients, the likelihood of being seen on time went from 84 percent in 1997 to 76 percent in 2006. Semi-urgent patients also were less likely to be seen in a timely fashion over time; 91 percent were seen within the recommended amount of time in 1997, but 85 percent were in 2006.

Hispanic patients and African-American patients were less likely to be seen in the recommended amount of time than whites, the researchers found, but whether or not a person had health insurance didn’t influence their likelihood of getting care on time.

In an editorial accompanying the study, Drs. Renee Y. Hsia and Jeffrey A. Tabas of the University of California, San Francisco, point out that the problem of ED wait times must be seen as a problem of the entire health care system.

“Most importantly, the ED is the sole true ‘safety net’ of the health care system, where patients cannot be denied care,” they add. While no one solution will solve the problem, they add, “health care reform offers some promise of help,” while improving electronic health care information systems could also add efficiency.

“The problem is serious and worsening, and we must implement a variety of solutions in the areas of ED input, throughput, and output as well as broader health system reform,” the editorialists say. “Otherwise our patients will remain waiting, waiting, waiting.”

SOURCE: Archives of Internal Medicine, November 9, 2009.

RELATED STORIES:
6,000 flu shots offered to most vulnerable North Coast residents   UNICEF says conflict puts more children at risk   Bush vows veto of any tampering with Medicare plan   N.J. gov. urges Bush to end stem-cell restrictions   California voters back $3 billion stem cell measure   U.S. moves to clarify rules for supplement makers   U.S. judge refuses more feeding in Schiavo case   Hospital emergency rooms overcrowded   Bush picks scientist to head EPA   Twin U.S. doctors accused of switching IDs   Nursing home admission predictable in middle-age   Virus hit hospital ward to reopen

Comments

[ + Post Your Own ]

Now you're in the public comment zone. What follows is not Armenian Medical Network's stuff; it comes from other people and we don't vouch for it. A reminder: By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.

There are no comments for this entry yet. [ + Comment here + ]