Silica issue clouds outlook for asbestos bill
|
Tweet
|
|
A bill to establish a $140-billion asbestos compensation fund was undergoing a rewrite on Wednesday after warnings that a provision affecting claims for silica, another lung-scarring mineral, could derail the legislation.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter said he thought he could solve the problem and save his plan to set up a trust fund to replace asbestos litigation.
But other Republicans expressed exasperation with the process, charging Democrats were moving the goalposts each time bipartisan agreement on the fund seemed close.
“Right now I don’t think it (Specter’s proposal) has much support on the part of a number of Republicans,” Sen. Orrin Hatch, a Utah Republican and former Judiciary Committee chairman, said after a hearing on the silica issue.
“We’ve got to work out how to bring both sides together and pass a bill that has a real shot,” said Hatch.
Companies and insurers that would contribute to the fund have complained that trial lawyers are repackaging asbestos claims as injury from silica dust.
Lester Brickman, a Yeshiva University law professor, testified on Wednesday that more than half of 8,629 silica claimants in a Texas case had also filed asbestos claims.
Specter last month inserted a provision requiring claimants of injury from airborne substances other than asbestos to prove their injury was not caused by asbestos—thus keeping them from collecting twice.
But Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, the committee’s ranking Democrat, said asking victims of silica to “prove a negative” was unfair. His grandfather, a stonecutter, died of silicosis, a scarring of the lungs from inhaling silica dust.
“Some special interests are trying to limit their liability on cases not related to asbestos through a last-minute, overly broad provision,” Leahy told Wednesday’s hearing.
Asbestos was used for fireproofing and insulation until the 1970s. Scientists say its inhaled fibers are linked to cancer and other diseases. Hundreds of thousands of injury claims have been filed in U.S. courts, bankrupting dozens of companies.
“It is a potential deal-breaker,” California Democrat Sen. Dianne Feinstein said of the silica provision.
Specter told interested parties to get together immediately and start trying to rewrite the silica language. “I think we are on the track to solving it,” Specter said.
Revision date: July 5, 2011
Last revised: by David A. Scott, M.D.
| RELATED STORIES: | ||
| Comments | [ + Post Your Own ] |
Now you're in the public comment zone. What follows is not Armenian Medical Network's stuff; it comes from other people and we don't vouch for it. A reminder: By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
There are no comments for this entry yet. [ + Comment here + ]
We are pleased to let readers post comments about an article. Please increase the credibility of your post by including your full name and email.
All comments are reviewed by our editors before they are posted on the site. Just keep it clean, kids.
- Full Story - - »»»
Best time for a coffee break? There’s an app for that
- Full Story - - »»»
Cellphone Use Linked to Selfish Behavior in UMD Study
- Full Story - - »»»
Optimism about heart risks may be a good thing
- Full Story - - »»»
New guidelines developed for improved DVT diagnosis
- Full Story - - »»»
Teen pregnancy, abortion rates at record low, study says
- Full Story - - »»»
Think you can’t get pregnant? Try again, study says
- Full Story - - »»»

