Short-term Celebrex seems safe for osteoarthritis
|
Tweet
|
|
The COX-2 inhibitor Celebrex (celecoxib) causes fewer gastrointestinal complications than traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory painkillers or NSAIDs, without raising the risk of cardiovascular events, according to results of a large, prospective, 3-month trial.
Some clinical trials have demonstrated increased cardiovascular risk associated with other COX-2 inhibitors, which led to the withdrawal of two from the market—Vioxx (rofecoxib) and Bextra (valdecoxib). Results of one study suggested that Celebrex, given in large doses (800 mg/day) over prolonged periods of time, may also have a worse cardiovascular risk profile than nonspecific NSAIDs, whereas other studies showed no such risk.
The SUccessive Celecoxib Efficacy and Safety Study-1 (SUCCESS-1), conducted in 39 countries, enrolled 13,194 patients with osteoarthritis of the hip, knee or hand of at least 6 months duration.
The investigators, led by Dr. Gurkirpal Singh from Stanford University School of Medicine in California, randomized patients to Celebrex (100 or 200 mg twice daily), the NSAID naproxen (500 mg twice daily) or the NSAID diclofenac (50 mg twice daily). Treatment lasted for 12 weeks.
The researchers report in the American Journal of Medicine for March that all treatments were similarly effective in reducing pain. Moreover, Celebrex 100 mg twice daily was comparable to Celebrex 200 mg twice daily.
The incidence of serious upper gastrointestinal events was 1.0 per 100 patient-years in the NSAID groups and 0.2 per 100 patient-years in the Celebrex groups (odds ratio 6.02).
Although numerical differences were seen, there was no statistically significant difference between Celebrex and NSAIDs in any cardiovascular adverse event rate, except that the rate of heart failure was higher in the NSAID group.
When making recommendations for treatment of osteoarthritis, Singh’s group advises, “clinicians should consider a number of factors, including the risk for upper gastrointestinal events, duration of therapy, as well as costs, before deciding upon individual patient treatment.”
SOURCE: American Journal of Medicine, March 2006.
Revision date: July 9, 2011
Last revised: by Sebastian Scheller, MD, ScD
| RELATED STORIES: | ||
| Comments | [ + Post Your Own ] |
Now you're in the public comment zone. What follows is not Armenian Medical Network's stuff; it comes from other people and we don't vouch for it. A reminder: By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
There are no comments for this entry yet. [ + Comment here + ]
We are pleased to let readers post comments about an article. Please increase the credibility of your post by including your full name and email.
All comments are reviewed by our editors before they are posted on the site. Just keep it clean, kids.
- Full Story - - »»»
Best time for a coffee break? There’s an app for that
- Full Story - - »»»
Cellphone Use Linked to Selfish Behavior in UMD Study
- Full Story - - »»»
Optimism about heart risks may be a good thing
- Full Story - - »»»
New guidelines developed for improved DVT diagnosis
- Full Story - - »»»
Teen pregnancy, abortion rates at record low, study says
- Full Story - - »»»
Think you can’t get pregnant? Try again, study says
- Full Story - - »»»

