Niacin Does Not Reduce Heart Attack, Stroke Risk in Stable, Cardiovascular Patients Whose Cholesterol is Well-Controlled to Treatment Guidelines

	Tweet

In patients whose bad cholesterol is very well-controlled by Statins for a long time period, the addition of high-dose, extended release niacin did not reduce the risk of cardiovascular events, including heart attack and stroke.

That is the finding being reported today (Nov. 15) at the American Heart Association annual meeting by the study’s co-principal investigator, University at Buffalo professor of medicine William E. Boden, MD; the results are also being published as the lead article in today’s New England Journal of Medicine.

Boden was co-principal investigator, along with Jeffrey Probstfield, MD, professor of cardiology and medicine at the University of Washington. Both researchers led the Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic Syndrome with Low HDL/High Triglycerides: Impact on Global Health (AIM-HIGH) study.

The trial’s purpose was to find out if—in the setting of well-treated LDL ("bad" cholesterol levels) and low HDL ("good" cholesterol levels)/elevated triglycerides—there was an incremental benefit of adding extended-release niacin. Unexpectedly, Boden explains, most patients enrolled in the trial met existing guideline recommendations for LDL and non-HDL levels, and therefore would not have been considered candidates for further lipid-modifying therapy.

Many patients with stable heart and vascular disease are still at high risk for cardiac death, heart attack or stroke even after their LDL cholesterol has reached ideal levels—between 40 and 80 mg/dL on statin therapy. It is believed that this increased residual risk occurs because they have too little HDL cholesterol along with high levels of triglycerides.

In the AIM-HIGH study, 1,718 patients received a high-dose (1,500 to 2,000 mg per day) of extended-release niacin, while 1,696 patients received a placebo.

After two years, HDL and triglyceride levels improved in the niacin group, with a 25 percent increase in good cholesterol, a 29 percent drop in triglycerides and a further decrease in bad cholesterol of approximately 12 percent. By contrast, in the placebo group, there was minimal change, with a 10 percent increase in good cholesterol and an eight percent drop in triglycerides.

The trial found that adding high-dose, extended-release niacin to statin treatment in these well-controlled patients with heart and cardiovascular disease, who had low HDL did not further reduce the risk of cardiovascular events, including heart attacks and stroke.

Because of the lack of benefit, the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, upon the recommendation of its Data Safety Monitoring Committee, decided to stop the trial 18 months before its planned completion.

“If you are a patient with stable cardiovascular disease who has achieved and maintained very low levels of LDL cholesterol on a statin for a long time period, these research findings indicate the addition of high-dose niacin does not improve your risk for future events, and is not needed,” explains Boden.

He cautions, however, that these results do not apply to the majority of patients seen in routine clinical settings, where more than 80 percent are unable to lower their cholesterol levels to the degree seen in AIM-HIGH.

“The AIM-HIGH trial was designed to study extended-release niacin or Niaspan, in a specific, narrowly defined patient population,” says Boden. “That is why the results of AIM-HIGH cannot be extrapolated to apply to a broader patient population, especially higher-risk patients admitted for heart attack or acute coronary syndrome, for example, or those whose LDL, or non-HDL levels, are not as well-controlled as those in AIM-HIGH, where prior studies have shown benefit.

“The more relevant observation is that, in this modern era of statin therapy, we’ve made profound progress in controlling LDL,” Boden continues. “However, based on these results, physicians should not assume that boosting HDL levels with Niaspan is without merit.”

In addition to Boden and Probstfield, the members of the Writing Group that authored the NEJM paper are: Todd Anderson, MD, of the University of Calgary and Libin Cardiovascular Institute; Bernard R. Chaitman, MD, St. Louis University; Patrice Desvignes-Nickens, MD, of the National Institutes of Health; Kent Koprowicz and Ruth McBride of Axio Research; Koon Teo, PhD, of McMaster University; and William Weintraub, MD, Christiana Care Health Services.

The University at Buffalo is a premier research-intensive public university, a flagship institution in the State University of New York system and its largest and most comprehensive campus. UB’s more than 28,000 students pursue their academic interests through more than 300 undergraduate, graduate and professional degree programs. Founded in 1846, the University at Buffalo is a member of the Association of American Universities.

###

###

Ellen Goldbaum

goldbaum@buffalo.edu
716-645-4605
twitter @egoldbaum

RELATED STORIES:
Folic acid doesn’t cut risk of stroke: study   Diabetes associated with higher risk of cardiovascular problems in men   Women Who Eat Foods With High Glycemic Index May Be at Greater Risk for Heart Disease   MRI can help decide therapy in patients with unclear-onset stroke   Mayo Clinic finds estrogen may prevent younger menopausal women from strokes   Work stress ‘doubles heart risk’   Meds for breathing problems can raise heart risks   Researchers find link between common dietary fat, intestinal microbes and heart disease   Women More Likely than Men to be Hospitalized for Chest Pain   Stroke risk higher in less well-educated women   Arsenic in drinking water tied to stroke risk   Obesity epidemic risks heart disease “tsunami”

Comments

[ + Post Your Own ]

Now you're in the public comment zone. What follows is not Armenian Medical Network's stuff; it comes from other people and we don't vouch for it. A reminder: By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.

There are no comments for this entry yet. [ + Comment here + ]