Not all children outgrow insect sting allergy
|
Tweet
|
|
Most children who have allergic reactions to bee or wasp stings no longer have a reaction by the time they become adults, but about one in five remains allergic, a Johns Hopkins University research team has found.
Children treated with venom immunotherapy to reduce the risk of a serious reaction to bee stings, however, continue to benefit from the treatment even 10 to 20 years later, the team reports in this week’s New England Journal of Medicine.
| Allergy Relief |
Some of the medications used to treat respiratory allergy symptoms include antihistamines, decongestants, nasal sprays and eyedrops.
What do medications do?
|
Stings occurred in 64 subjects who had undergone venom immunotherapy for an average of 3-1/2 years, and in 111 who had not. Three percent of the treated patients had fairly severe allergic reactions, compared with 17 percent of those in the untreated group.
Six patients, none of whom had been given immunotherapy, had more severe reactions to a recent sting than they had experienced previously. Among the 22 with moderate-to-severe reactions to the first sting, six had a similar reaction during the last episode.
Two patients who had been given immunotherapy had a moderate allergic reaction to a recent sting, while their original reaction had been severe.
Thus, Golden’s group concludes, the prolonged reduction in risk after treatment implies that children can stop venom immunotherapy after 3 to 5 years.
“Both the risk of allergic reaction to stings and the benefit of venom immunotherapy are greatest for the 40 percent of children with allergy to insect stings who originally had moderate-to-severe systemic reactions,” they add.
For the other 60 percent, venom immunotherapy seems to be unnecessary.
Given this “hard data,” doctors should “support the use of venom immunotherapy for the children most at risk,” Dr. Rebecca S. Gruchalla of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas states in an accompanying editorial.
SOURCE: New England Journal of Medicine, August 12, 2004.
Revision date: July 5, 2011
Last revised: by Sebastian Scheller, MD, ScD
| RELATED STORIES: | ||
| Comments | [ + Post Your Own ] |
Now you're in the public comment zone. What follows is not Armenian Medical Network's stuff; it comes from other people and we don't vouch for it. A reminder: By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
There are no comments for this entry yet. [ + Comment here + ]
We are pleased to let readers post comments about an article. Please increase the credibility of your post by including your full name and email.
All comments are reviewed by our editors before they are posted on the site. Just keep it clean, kids.
- Full Story - - »»»
State tobacco prevention funding lacking
- Full Story - - »»»
C-Section Babies Face High Obesity Risk
- Full Story - - »»»
Scientists turn skin cells into beating heart muscle
- Full Story - - »»»
Too many people get angioplasties, study suggests
- Full Story - - »»»
Comparing Birth Control Pill Types
- Full Story - - »»»
Viewers’ family background affects how they react to MTV shows ‘16 and Pregnant,’ ‘Teen Mom’
- Full Story - - »»»

