Mammography every two years may be OK after 50
|
Tweet
|
|
In women who are at least 50 years of age, there is no increase in late-stage breast cancer when screening mammography is performed every two years rather than annually, according to a new study. However, in younger women, biennial screening is associated with an increased risk of late-stage disease.
“These findings may be useful for policy decisions about appropriate screening intervals and for use in statistical models that estimate the costs and benefits of mammography by age and screening interval,” lead study author Dr. Emily White, from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, and colleagues note.
The findings, which appear in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, are based on a study of women who were diagnosed with breast cancer after mammography screening intervals of one or two years. The former group included 5400 subjects and the latter included 2440. Late-stage breast cancer is associated with shorter survival times compared with breast cancer diagnosed at an early stage.
Among women in their 40s, the rates of late-stage breast cancer for annual- and biennial-screened subjects were 21 percent and 28 percent, respectively. This amounts to a 35 percent increased risk for biennial screening.
As noted, the screening interval had no effect on the occurrence of late-stage disease in older women, the investigators point out.
The authors also found no evidence that one type of interval was better than the other based on whether the breasts were dense or fatty. “To our knowledge, we are the first to report on this issue,” they write.
“Our findings are generally consistent with those of previous studies,” White’s team notes.
SOURCE: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, December 15, 2004.
Revision date: June 22, 2011
Last revised: by Dave R. Roger, M.D.
| RELATED STORIES: | ||
| Comments | [ + Post Your Own ] |
Now you're in the public comment zone. What follows is not Armenian Medical Network's stuff; it comes from other people and we don't vouch for it. A reminder: By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
There are no comments for this entry yet. [ + Comment here + ]
We are pleased to let readers post comments about an article. Please increase the credibility of your post by including your full name and email.
All comments are reviewed by our editors before they are posted on the site. Just keep it clean, kids.
- Full Story - - »»»
Low vitamin D in diet increases stroke risk in Japanese-Americans
- Full Story - - »»»
Obesity not always tied to higher heart risk: study
- Full Story - - »»»
Scientists turn skin cells into beating heart muscle
- Full Story - - »»»
Too many people get angioplasties, study suggests
- Full Story - - »»»
Viewers’ family background affects how they react to MTV shows ‘16 and Pregnant,’ ‘Teen Mom’
- Full Story - - »»»
Weight management in pregnancy with diet is beneficial and safe and can reduce complications
- Full Story - - »»»

