Heart patients often stop their medication
|
Tweet
|
|
You’ve survived a heart attack and made it out of the hospital. Wouldn’t you stick to the medication you’ve been prescribed? A surprising number of people do not, apparently.
As many as 20 percent of patients hospitalized with a heart attack or heart-related chest pains stop taking prescribed medication within six months, researchers report in the American Journal of Medicine.
"We need to understand why patients are stopping their medications,” lead investigator Dr. Kim A. Eagle told Reuters Health.
Numerous clinical trials have shown that drugs such as aspirin, beta-blockers, cholesterol-lowering “statins” and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors can prevent a second heart attack or recurrence of serious episodes of angina.
“These particular therapies are known to prolong life in appropriate candidates, so stopping them without a sound medical reason can be detrimental to patient outcomes,” said Eagle, of the University of Michigan Cardiovascular Center in Ann Arbor.
To investigate patients’ adherence to their treatment regimen, Eagle and colleagues studied 21,408 patients discharged from 104 institutions after a heart attack or severe angina. Details were available for 13,830 patients from 5 to 12 months after discharge.
By six months, 8 percent of those prescribed aspirin had discontinued treatment; 12 percent of the patients prescribed beta-blockers had stopped; 13 percent of those on statin drugs quit therapy; and 20 percent of patients prescribed ACE inhibitors stopped taking them.
Younger patients were more likely to stick to aspirin and beta-blocker therapy than older patients. Care by a cardiologist also improved compliance with aspirin therapy. Being male and previously having had heart failure increased ACE inhibitor adherence, the team found.
“How patients receive and then are maintained on the right medications is complicated and highly variable,” Eagle said.
“Until the health professions are able to properly tease out the barriers—and there are many—we are not going to achieve the degree of secondary prevention that we know is possible,” he concluded.
SOURCE: American Journal of Medicine, July 15, 2004.
Revision date: June 11, 2011
Last revised: by Andrew G. Epstein, M.D.
| RELATED STORIES: | ||
| Comments | [ + Post Your Own ] |
Now you're in the public comment zone. What follows is not Armenian Medical Network's stuff; it comes from other people and we don't vouch for it. A reminder: By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
There are no comments for this entry yet. [ + Comment here + ]
We are pleased to let readers post comments about an article. Please increase the credibility of your post by including your full name and email.
All comments are reviewed by our editors before they are posted on the site. Just keep it clean, kids.
- Full Story - - »»»
Best time for a coffee break? There’s an app for that
- Full Story - - »»»
Cellphone Use Linked to Selfish Behavior in UMD Study
- Full Story - - »»»
Optimism about heart risks may be a good thing
- Full Story - - »»»
New guidelines developed for improved DVT diagnosis
- Full Story - - »»»
Teen pregnancy, abortion rates at record low, study says
- Full Story - - »»»
Think you can’t get pregnant? Try again, study says
- Full Story - - »»»

