Dutch docs often help terminal patients die
|
Tweet
|
|
In face-to-face interviews with 410 physicians in the Netherlands, 52 percent said that in the previous two years they had administered sedating medications while withholding fluids and nutrition for patients nearing death.
So-called “terminal sedation” was most commonly used to relieve severe pain (51 percent), agitation (38 percent), breathlessness (38 percent) and anxiety (11 percent). Hastening death was partly the intention of the physician in 47 percent of the terminal sedation cases and the explicit intention for 17 percent.
However, less extreme measures might have helped these patients, a U.S. physician suggests.
According to their report in the Annals of Internal Medicine, Dr. Judith A. C. Rietjens from Erasmus Medical Center in Amsterdam, and colleagues, found that physicians discussed the use of terminal sedation with the patient in 59 percent of cases and with patients’ relatives 93 percent of instances. The decision to forgo food and water was discussed with the patient in only 34 percent of cases.
While physicians surveyed “almost always” discussed the use of terminal sedation with relatives, Rietjens and colleagues found it “remarkable” that general practitioners often did not consult other physicians or caregivers and rarely sought the advice of specialists in palliative care or pain management.
This concerns Dr. Muriel R. Gillick from Harvard Medical School in Boston, who notes in an editorial that “although state-of-the-art palliative care should substantially control pain in 90 percent of cases,” pain was the most common reason for turning to terminal sedation.
“That the Dutch physicians seldom used palliative care consultation underscores the concern that they may have used terminal sedation when a less drastic approach existed,” Gillick writes.
She feels that the experience in the Netherlands “should lead the medical profession as a whole to conclude that we need to control the use of terminal sedation by developing and implementing practice guidelines.”
SOURCE: Annals of Internal Medicine, August 3, 2004.
Revision date: June 14, 2011
Last revised: by Dave R. Roger, M.D.
| RELATED STORIES: | ||
| Comments | [ + Post Your Own ] |
Now you're in the public comment zone. What follows is not Armenian Medical Network's stuff; it comes from other people and we don't vouch for it. A reminder: By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
There are no comments for this entry yet. [ + Comment here + ]
We are pleased to let readers post comments about an article. Please increase the credibility of your post by including your full name and email.
All comments are reviewed by our editors before they are posted on the site. Just keep it clean, kids.
- Full Story - - »»»
Best time for a coffee break? There’s an app for that
- Full Story - - »»»
Cellphone Use Linked to Selfish Behavior in UMD Study
- Full Story - - »»»
Optimism about heart risks may be a good thing
- Full Story - - »»»
New guidelines developed for improved DVT diagnosis
- Full Story - - »»»
Teen pregnancy, abortion rates at record low, study says
- Full Story - - »»»
Think you can’t get pregnant? Try again, study says
- Full Story - - »»»

