Computers no cure-all for medical errors - study
|
Tweet
|
|
Using computers to prescribe drugs has helped doctors curb dangerous errors caused by messy handwriting and bureaucratic mishaps, but the technology can create its share of mistakes, a study said on Tuesday.
In some cases, fragmented computer displays result in prescription errors, or drug inventory information from the pharmacy has been mistaken for dosage guidelines.
In other cases, doctors’ orders to renew a drug were placed on paper charts but not on the computer system, drugs were incorrectly ordered more than once, incompatible drugs were ordered simultaneously, or the computer system’s inflexibility generated its own mistakes.
"The literature on (Computer Physician Order Entry systems), with few exceptions, is enthusiastic. Our findings, however, reveal that CPOE systems can facilitate error risks in addition to reducing them,” wrote chief study author Ross Koppel of the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
Noting that 770,000 U.S. patients are killed or injured annually by so-called adverse drug events, the report said previous research had shown computer entry systems had sharply reduced medication errors. But it concluded the technology needed constant attention and continuous revisions.
“This limitation is especially noteworthy because many problems we identified are easily corrected,” he wrote in a report published in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Koppel and his colleagues interviewed a 261-person hospital staff using a computer ordering system, discovering 22 types of medication errors that were experienced by three-quarters of those surveyed.
An accompanying editorial in the same journal said the findings were disappointing but not surprising.
“Clearly, there is no reason to expect health care, which is from an organizational standpoint probably the most complex enterprise in modern society, to be immune to (problems),” wrote Robert Wears of the University of Florida, Jacksonville, and Marc Berg, of Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
“Since roughly 75 percent of all large (information technology) projects in health care fail, inattention to these lessons is, at best, wasteful of time and resources and, at worst, harmful to patients and clinicians,” they wrote.
Revision date: July 9, 2011
Last revised: by Sebastian Scheller, MD, ScD
| RELATED STORIES: | ||
| Comments | [ + Post Your Own ] |
Now you're in the public comment zone. What follows is not Armenian Medical Network's stuff; it comes from other people and we don't vouch for it. A reminder: By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
There are no comments for this entry yet. [ + Comment here + ]
We are pleased to let readers post comments about an article. Please increase the credibility of your post by including your full name and email.
All comments are reviewed by our editors before they are posted on the site. Just keep it clean, kids.
- Full Story - - »»»
Best time for a coffee break? There’s an app for that
- Full Story - - »»»
Cellphone Use Linked to Selfish Behavior in UMD Study
- Full Story - - »»»
Optimism about heart risks may be a good thing
- Full Story - - »»»
New guidelines developed for improved DVT diagnosis
- Full Story - - »»»
Teen pregnancy, abortion rates at record low, study says
- Full Story - - »»»
Think you can’t get pregnant? Try again, study says
- Full Story - - »»»

