Carbon pollution blamed for heart damage

	Tweet

Air pollution clearly causes immediate damage to the heart, including heart attacks, but its short-term effects on asthma and other respiratory symptoms are harder to document, U.S. researchers said on Wednesday.

The report from the Electric Power Research Institute also contradicts many other studies that have implicated airborne compounds known as sulfates for damaging health. Instead, the researchers said, carbon or metal-based compounds may be more dangerous, at least on a day-to-day basis.

"The pollutants of most concern are carbon monoxide and carbon-containing particles in the atmosphere,” Ron Wyzga, an EPRI executive, told a news conference.

The EPRI is an independent, non-profit center set up to study health effects associated with the power industry. Some environmental groups say it is biased because it receives industry funding.

The EPRI has been studying the health effects of air pollution over Atlanta, as a typical Eastern U.S. city, since 1998. The study is epidemiological, meaning it looks at the population as a whole and not at individual effects and so far it has only looked at short-term effects.

Details have been given to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the group said.

The more pollution, the higher the rate of heart-related deaths, emergency room admissions, visits to doctors and “events” forcing activation of defibrillators implanted in the chests of heart patients, the study found.

“When you go from a relatively low-pollution “clean” day ... to an average day, you see an increase in heart deaths of about 7 percent,” Wyzga said.

In one study backed by EPRI, Kristi Metzger of Emory University in Atlanta and colleagues collected information on 4.4 million emergency room visits at 31 hospitals from 1993 to 2000.

They found cardiovascular disease incidents in general went up in winter and were associated specifically with higher levels of ozone, nitrogen dioxide and carbon monoxide and of tiny particulates.

The study, published in the journal Epidemiology, did not break down the visits by specific type of heart emergency.

Particulates—bits of airborne metal, silica, soot, and other compounds, have longed been linked with health problems. In particular the sulfur-based compounds emitted by fossil fuel-burning power plants have been targeted.

“In Atlanta we did not see any consistent results with sulfates,” Wyzga said.

This immediately attracted criticism from environmental groups.

“Numerous studies point specifically to sulfate and sulfur oxides pollution from coal combustion as strongly linked to health impacts and premature deaths,” said Dr. Jana Milford of Environmental Defense.

RELATED STORIES:
Deconditioning may help athletes with heart condition   Stent studies don’t reflect “real world” patients   Should some kids take fish oil supplements?   Heart drug reduces bone breaks   Lower MI Survival in Women May Be Due to Poorer Management   Pediatric cardiologists not always accurate in interpreting ECG results for young athletes   Testosterone Replacement for Men with Low Testosterone Improves Liver Function, Metabolic Syndrome   Hasseled teens may face high heart risk later   Quality of life okay after repaired heart defect   In India, 1 in 25 People Carry Gene That Causes Heart Failure   Coffee: Is it Good or Bad for You?   Spanish heart risk study challenges image of healthy Mediterranean diet and lifestyle

Comments

[ + Post Your Own ]

Now you're in the public comment zone. What follows is not Armenian Medical Network's stuff; it comes from other people and we don't vouch for it. A reminder: By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.

There are no comments for this entry yet. [ + Comment here + ]