Biofeedback best for common type of constipation
|
Tweet
|
|
Study findings indicate that biofeedback is far more effective than laxatives in relieving constipation caused by inappropriate contraction or inability to relax the pelvic floor muscles during defecation—what doctors call “pelvic floor dyssynergia.”
“Biofeedback should become the treatment of choice for this common and easily diagnosed type of constipation,” the investigators conclude.
In a randomized, controlled trial, Dr. Giuseppe Chiarioni from the University of Verona in Italy and an international team compared the effects of five weekly 30-minute biofeedback sessions with one of the most effective laxatives (polyethylene glycol) plus constipation prevention counseling.
Biofeedback training included teaching subjects to strain more effectively, to coordinate expulsion efforts with their breathing and to relax pelvic floor muscles.
The study involved 109 patients (all but five of whom were women) with constipation due to chronic severe pelvic floor dyssynergia who had failed attempts to relieve constipation with 20 grams per day of fiber plus enemas or suppositories up to twice weekly.
Biofeedback, Chiarioni told Reuters Health, proved “highly effective in determining a long lasting improvement in constipation symptoms and anorectal function in the majority of patients. Continuous laxatives, on the other hand, were marginally effective in a minority of patients.”
Specifically, at 6 months 80 percent of the biofeedback group had “major improvement” in constipation compared with just 22 percent of the laxative group. The benefits of biofeedback were still evident at 2 years, the team reports.
Compared with laxatives, biofeedback produced greater reductions in straining, sensations of incomplete evacuation, and blockage, use of enemas and suppositories and abnormal pain, according to a report of the study in Gastroenterology. Stool frequency increased in both treatment arms.
Pelvic floor dyssynergia is one of the most disabling subtypes of constipation. “Our findings should prompt physicians to search for this common subtype of functional constipation to avoid treating affected patients with a poorly effective therapy (laxatives),” Dr. Chiarioni told Reuters Health.
SOURCE: Gastroenterology March 2006.
Revision date: June 22, 2011
Last revised: by Jorge P. Ribeiro, MD
| RELATED STORIES: | ||
| Comments | [ + Post Your Own ] |
Now you're in the public comment zone. What follows is not Armenian Medical Network's stuff; it comes from other people and we don't vouch for it. A reminder: By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
![]()
I’ve read all the Chiaroni papers and found them quite fascinating. The electronic set up was the most innovative. Basically they had to place an electrical read out device in the lower rectum to record responses in the muscles.
|
|
We are pleased to let readers post comments about an article. Please increase the credibility of your post by including your full name and email.
All comments are reviewed by our editors before they are posted on the site. Just keep it clean, kids.
- Full Story - - »»»
Exercise tied to lower risk of psoriasis: study
- Full Story - - »»»
Severe Gum Disease, Impotence May Be Linked
- Full Story - - »»»
New Blood Thinner May Lower Chances of Clots in High-Risk Heart Patients: FDA
- Full Story - - »»»
Heart Damage After Chemo Linked to Stress in Cardiac Cells
- Full Story - - »»»
Viewers’ family background affects how they react to MTV shows ‘16 and Pregnant,’ ‘Teen Mom’
- Full Story - - »»»
Weight management in pregnancy with diet is beneficial and safe and can reduce complications
- Full Story - - »»»

