Biggest study of GMO finds impact on birds, bees

	Tweet

The world’s biggest study to date on the impact of genetically modified (GMO) crops on wildlife found birds and bees are more likely to thrive in fields of natural rapeseed than GMO seed, scientists said.

But scientists behind the British study were keen to stress the differences between the two arose not because the crop was genetically engineered but because of the way pesticides were applied.

“The study demonstrates the important of the effects of herbicide management on wildlife in fields and adjacent areas,” researcher David Bohan said.

Green groups, however, were aghast.

“These results are yet another major blow to the biotech industry. Growing GM winter oilseed rape would have a negative impact on farmland wildlife,” Friends of the Earth campaigner Clare Oxborrow said.

The trial was the last in a four-part 5.5 million-pound ($9.5 million) test of controversial technology—the largest experiment of its kind in the world.

Scientists said that when compared with conventional winter-sown rapeseed, GMO herbicide-resistant plants kept the same number of weeds overall, having more grass weeds but fewer broad-leaved weeds.

Flowers of broad-leaved weeds provide food for insects, while their seeds are an important food source for other wildlife.

Researchers said that while fields planted with the biotech version were found to have fewer butterflies and bees, differences arose not because the crop was genetically changed but because of the way they were sprayed.

In October 2003, the same government trials found that GMO sugar beet spraying was significantly more damaging to the environment than the management of conventional varieties.

They also concluded that gene-spliced spring-sown rapeseed may also have a negative impact on wildlife, while GMO feed maize did not.

“GMO CROPS ARE BETTER”

The biotech lobby insists the crops are safe.

“GM crops offer a better, more flexible weed management option for farmers and, as the results today indicate, the difference between the impact of growing GM and non-GM crops on biodiversity is minimal,” Tony Combes, deputy chairman of the Agricultural Biotechnology Council, which represents biotech firms like Monsanto and Syngenta.

Despite optimism from proponents of the technology, GMO crops seem a long way off in Britain.

Last year, the only firm to win approval to grow a GMO crop in Britain—Germany’s Bayer CropScience—abandoned field testing of GMO crops in Britain. It also withdrew any outstanding applications awaiting government approval to sell biotech seeds.

As a result, no new GMO seeds are awaiting approval in Britain, whereas in the mid-1990s more than 50 different GMO. 

RELATED STORIES:
Can fish for dinner lead to diabetes?   Infant foods should be screened for mycotoxins   A Dangerously Tasty Treat: the Hot Dog Is a Choking Hazard   Researchers Cast About for Answers on Fish Benefits and Risks   Michigan Tech Students, Staff Belly Up to Healthy Eating   70 percent of 8-month-olds consume too much salt   Green Tea Compounds Beat OSA-Related Brain Deficits   Quebec ban on fast-food ads reduced consumption of junk food   Milk powder suspected in China mass poisoning.   Hold the Red Bull: Energy Drinks Don’t Blunt Effects of Alcohol, Study Finds   K-State chemists’ biosensor may improve food, water safety and cancer detection   Eating nuts associated with improvements in cholesterol levels

Comments

[ + Post Your Own ]

Now you're in the public comment zone. What follows is not Armenian Medical Network's stuff; it comes from other people and we don't vouch for it. A reminder: By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.

There are no comments for this entry yet. [ + Comment here + ]