Alfuzosin safe for older patients with cardiovascular disease
|
Tweet
|
|
Older age, cardiovascular comorbidity and the use of antihypertensive medication do not affect a patient’s tolerance of alfusozin, an alpha-1-blocker used to treat lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), according to an international group of researchers.
“The results confirm the efficacy and safety profile of alfuzosin as already demonstrated in phase III studies,” researchers led by Dr. Rudolph Hartung, from the Urology Clinic at the University of Munich in Germany, write in the Journal of Urology.
Alpha-1-blockers are a first-line treatment option for LUTS suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction. Because some of these compounds have recently been shown to differ in their cardiovascular safety profiles, the team assessed the use of alfuzosin in “real-life” practice.
The study included patients usually excluded from phase III studies because of their co-morbid conditions, according to the authors. However, “the physician is confronted with such patients in daily clinical practice and should be aware of the efficacy and safety of [alfuzosin] in such populations,” they note.
In all, 6,523 men were given open label alfuzosin (10 mg once daily) and followed for six months. After being divided by age quartile—younger than 60, 60 to 64, 65 to 70 and older than 70 years—outcomes were analyzed considering the patients’ co-morbidity with either hypertension, ischemic heart disease or diabetes, and eventual concomitant intake of antihypertensive agents.
The results show that the alfuzosin regimen was effective and well-tolerated. Despite the increased prevalence of cardiovascular co-morbidities and polypharmacy with age, the changes observed in blood pressure did not significantly differ among the age groups. In men with hypertension and those receiving hypertensive medication, changes in blood pressure and heart rate remained minor (less than 3mm Hg) compared to controls, according to the authors.
Results also showed that the percent of individuals who experienced adverse effects did not significantly differ by quartile: 23.9% of all patients experienced adverse events such as dizziness, and 3.5% experienced serious adverse effects.
J Urol 2006;175:624-628.
Revision date: July 5, 2011
Last revised: by David A. Scott, M.D.
| RELATED STORIES: | ||
| Comments | [ + Post Your Own ] |
Now you're in the public comment zone. What follows is not Armenian Medical Network's stuff; it comes from other people and we don't vouch for it. A reminder: By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
There are no comments for this entry yet. [ + Comment here + ]
We are pleased to let readers post comments about an article. Please increase the credibility of your post by including your full name and email.
All comments are reviewed by our editors before they are posted on the site. Just keep it clean, kids.
- Full Story - - »»»
Best time for a coffee break? There’s an app for that
- Full Story - - »»»
Cellphone Use Linked to Selfish Behavior in UMD Study
- Full Story - - »»»
Optimism about heart risks may be a good thing
- Full Story - - »»»
New guidelines developed for improved DVT diagnosis
- Full Story - - »»»
Teen pregnancy, abortion rates at record low, study says
- Full Story - - »»»
Think you can’t get pregnant? Try again, study says
- Full Story - - »»»

