Acupuncture “minimally” helpful for breathlessness
|
Tweet
|
|
A standardized acupuncture technique is only marginally better than placebo treatment for people with disabling breathlessness that is not a result of cancer, according to a new report.
The acupuncture technique was previously shown to be beneficial in an open study of cancer patients with breathlessness, the authors explain in the medical journal Chest. Also, a small pilot study confirmed the feasibility of having nurse acupuncturists perform the procedure in breathless patients.
Dr. George T. Lewith from Royal South Hants Hospital in Southampton, UK, and colleagues compared a standardized acupuncture technique with a mock treatment given to 36 patients with disabling breathlessness, 33 from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The participants were crossed over from one procedure to the other in random fashion.
The average breathlessness improved after the first round of treatment, regardless of whether the patient received acupuncture or mock treatment, the authors report, and further improvement was seen after the second phase of treatment.
For the 12 patients who completed both phases of the study, acupuncture provided a slightly better improvement in breathlessness, but this was not statistically significant.
“If more patients had been entered,” the investigators write, “we might have reached a statistically significant result for real acupuncture versus placebo, but because the change was so small...it is arguable that this would have been of limited clinical relevance to breathless patients.”
Also, there were no significant differences in the treatments’ effects as measured by a quality-of-life questionnaire, the researchers note.
“Acupuncture, in this condition, is effective but not hugely efficacious,” Lewith told Reuters Health. “It may help, but as with all treatments in this condition its major effect is non-specific...But it is safe.”
However, he added, “This condition is very difficult to treat, so anything that is safe and fairly free from side effects is a good idea.”
SOURCE: Chest, May 2004.
Revision date: July 6, 2011
Last revised: by Amalia K. Gagarina, M.S., R.D.
| RELATED STORIES: | ||
| Comments | [ + Post Your Own ] |
Now you're in the public comment zone. What follows is not Armenian Medical Network's stuff; it comes from other people and we don't vouch for it. A reminder: By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
There are no comments for this entry yet. [ + Comment here + ]
We are pleased to let readers post comments about an article. Please increase the credibility of your post by including your full name and email.
All comments are reviewed by our editors before they are posted on the site. Just keep it clean, kids.
- Full Story - - »»»
Best time for a coffee break? There’s an app for that
- Full Story - - »»»
Cellphone Use Linked to Selfish Behavior in UMD Study
- Full Story - - »»»
Optimism about heart risks may be a good thing
- Full Story - - »»»
New guidelines developed for improved DVT diagnosis
- Full Story - - »»»
Teen pregnancy, abortion rates at record low, study says
- Full Story - - »»»
Think you can’t get pregnant? Try again, study says
- Full Story - - »»»

