Peripheral arterial disease is a common circulation problem in which reduced blood flow can lead to complications that jeopardize the limbs, possibly even requiring amputation. Procedures known as revascularization have reduced the need for amputations 40 percent over two decades, Mayo Clinic research shows. The findings were among several studies presented at the Society for Vascular Surgery annual meeting in San Francisco.
In the amputation study, Mayo researchers analyzed patients in the Rochester Epidemiology Project, a National Institutes of Health-funded medical records pool that makes Olmsted County, Minn., the home of Mayo Clinic, one of the few places worldwide where scientists can study virtually an entire geographic population to identify health trends. They found that as use of revascularization to improve circulation rose, the amputation rate dropped. The study covered 1990-2009.
“This is an important study because frequently patients who have Peripheral arterial disease - and there are about 12 million Americans who have some leg pain that can be connected to it - may progress to amputation. They may develop rest pain, gangrene, and if an intervention is not performed, they may lose the limb,” says senior author Peter Gloviczki, M.D., a Mayo Clinic vascular surgeon and president of the Society for Vascular Surgery. “This study shows that the use of endovascular interventions - stents, balloons or other catheter-based interventions - or open surgical bypass effectively reduced the amputation rate.”
Patients with leg pain should report it to their physicians, and people with risk factors for Peripheral arterial disease, such as smoking, High cholesterol, male gender, hypertension or diabetes, should take care of the medical conditions that may lead to or complicate Peripheral arterial disease, he says.
“In addition, patients who have leg pain and Peripheral arterial disease frequently have silent heart disease, so the patient and primary care doctor should evaluate, and if the condition is significant, if the pain is something that interferes with the quality of life, then they should consult with a vascular surgeon,” says Dr. Gloviczki, the Joe M. and Ruth Roberts Professor of Surgery at Mayo Clinic.
Peripheral arterial disease patients" align="right" />
Other Mayo studies presented at the conference found that:
There are very few deaths in the initial weeks after open-abdomen surgery or the minimally invasive endovascular stent repair of life-threatening abdominal aortic aneurysms. Patients who get stent grafts have shorter hospitalizations and fewer early complications, but the procedure was associated with a slightly higher rate of late death from all causes, the need for a repeat procedure at some point and a small but definite risk of eventual rupture, the researchers found.
“The trend is that we do more and more stent procedures because it is easier for the patient, it can be performed in very high-risk patients and there is less early complication. The drawback is that we have to follow these patients lifelong, every six months to a year, because secondary complications or secondary interventions may be needed. And rarely, even the stented aneurysm can rupture,” says Dr. Gloviczki, a co-author, so it is not a complete solution for aneurysm repair yet. There are many patients who actually will do better with open repair, but stent repair is still an excellent new procedure that patients should ask about.”
Stents are an effective way to treat bulging of the arteries behind the knee, a condition known as popliteal artery aneurysm, the second most common aneurysm after abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Popliteal artery aneurysms are dangerous because about 20 percent involve severe leg circulation problems, and this type of aneurysm can throw blood clots and might lead to amputations, says Dr. Gloviczki. The goal of aneurysm repair is to prevent amputation, improve circulation and help with problems walking, he says.
“The study found that use of a stent is a good and effective way to treat popliteal artery aneurysm,” Dr. Gloviczki says. “It is not clearly better for all patients than open surgical bypass, but it is especially useful in patients who are high surgical risk for open surgery or anesthesia, such as patients who have had heart attacks or who have heart failure or any general overall condition that makes open surgery more complicated.”
Ethics disclosure: Gustavo Oderich, M.D., a Mayo vascular surgeon and co-author of the three studies, disclosed consulting fees or other payment from W.L. Gore & Associates Inc. and Cook Medical.