Sex-ed program may get adolescents to delay sex

	Tweet

After participating in a two-week sexual education program designed and implemented by an academic medical center, more middle-school students said they would hold off on having sex for the first time, Texas researchers report.

“Involvement by the medical profession can assure medically correct content, appropriate research outcomes, and enhanced quality of medical information in this important area of adolescent health,” Dr. Patricia J. Sulak of the Texas A&M University System Health Science Center College of Medicine in Temple and colleagues note in a report.

School officials in Temple had approached health care professionals at the medical school for assistance in developing a sex education program for sixth-, seventh- and eighth-graders. Parents and school officials wanted to emphasize postponing sexual activity, so the program focused in consequences of teen sex, as well as “skill building, character building, and refusal skills,” Sulak and her team point out in the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. Students who were considering having sex were “encouraged” to meet with a health care professional.

A total of 26,125 students completed surveys before the program, while 24,550 filled out identical surveys afterwards. Students in all grades showed an improvement in their knowledge, on average, after the course.

Before the sex ed program, 84 percent of students said they would delay having sex until after high school. This figure rose to nearly 87 percent after the program.

The biggest effect was seen in the percentage of kids who said they wouldn’t have sex until after marriage; before the program, about 60 percent said they planned to remain virgins until they married, while nearly 71 percent said they would after the program.

Other factors associated with planning to delay sex included attending religious services and watching two hours or less of television on school nights. Students whose original parents were still married were also more likely to report that they would wait to have sex.

Students who rated themselves as “less than C” students were more likely to think that teens should “have sex whenever they want,” and also fared worse on knowledge tests after the program.

Kids who start having sex earlier are at greater risk of sexually transmitted disease and pregnancy, Sulak and her colleagues note. “By placing medical emphasis on risk avoidance and primary prevention of disease,” they conclude, “encouraging adolescents to delay sexual onset can lead to significant health benefits.”

SOURCE: American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, July 2006.

RELATED STORIES:
School drug programs may curb risky sex   Placebo Effect Significantly Improves Women’s Sexual Satisfaction, Study Shows   How do I masturbate?   Rates of chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis up in U.S.   Vatican condemns free sex change hormones   Study Offers Evolutionary Perspective on After-Sex Behaviors   Sex during pregnancy myth debunked   Many pregnant women may not get STD tests   To fight prostitution, some say target clients   Indian state AIDS body wants to legalise gay sex   A study confirms the importance of sexual fantasies in the experience of sexual desire   Germany offers therapy to child sex abuse victims   Teens may have trouble getting morning-after pill   While prevalent, sexual problems in women not always associated with distress   Cow infections could provide clue to preventing infertility in women

Comments

[ + Post Your Own ]

Now you're in the public comment zone. What follows is not Armenian Medical Network's stuff; it comes from other people and we don't vouch for it. A reminder: By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.

There are no comments for this entry yet. [ + Comment here + ]