Secondhand smoke linked to cervical cancer

Key points
- Exposure to secondhand smoke appears to increase the risk of cervical cancer, albeit to a lesser extent than active smoking, new research shows.
- "There was good reason to think that passive smoking might be associated with cervical cancer, given the link with active smoking," Dr.
- He noted that studies of cross-sections of different populations have supported the link to passive smoking, but there has been a lack of evidence from forward-looking studies that follow people over a period of time to see who develops cervical cancer.
- To address this issue, Alberg's team conducted a study involving nearly 25,000 women who were surveyed about household smoking in 1963 and over 26,000 who were surveyed in 1975.
Exposure to secondhand smoke appears to increase the risk of cervical cancer, albeit to a lesser extent than active smoking, new research shows.
"There was good reason to think that passive smoking might be associated with cervical cancer, given the link with active smoking," Dr. Anthony J. Alberg, from Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, told AMN Health.
He noted that studies of cross-sections of different populations have supported the link to passive smoking, but there has been a lack of evidence from forward-looking studies that follow people over a period of time to see who develops cervical cancer.
To address this issue, Alberg's team conducted a study involving nearly 25,000 women who were surveyed about household smoking in 1963 and over 26,000 who were surveyed in 1975. Cancer registry data were analyzed to determine the occurrence of cervical cancer in the two groups up to 15 years after they were surveyed.
The researchers' findings appear in the medical journal Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Exposure to passive smoking increased the risk of cervical cancer by 2.1-fold in the 1963 group and 1.4-fold in the 1975 group. The corresponding increases in risk for women who actively smoked were 2.6- and 1.7-fold.
"The twofold increased risk linked to passive smoking in the earlier cohort is almost too strong," Alberg said. "I suspect the true risk lies somewhere between the risks seen in each cohort, probably closer to the 1.4-fold increased risk. Unfortunately, we don't have a good explanation for why the risks differed so much between the cohorts."
Nonetheless, he added, there is really "no reason why passive smoking shouldn't be associated with cervical cancer if active smoking is."
SOURCE: Obstetrics and Gynecology, January 2005.
Written and revised by
Gerald Hurowitz, M.D.
Our doctors write and review articles for accuracy and keep them up to date.
health.am provides general information, not medical advice. Always consult a qualified health professional about your own health.
Explore health topics
More in this topic
Addiction →
NewsSecondhand smoke damages lungs, MRIs show
It’s not a smoking gun, but it’s smoking-related, and it’s there in bright medical images: evidence of microscopic structural damage deep in the lungs, caused by secondhand cigarette smoke. For the first time,…
27 November 2007
NewsSecondhand Smoke: Evidence Proves Ill Effects
The debate is over, according to a 2006 surgeon general’s report on secondhand smoke. Smoke from other people’s burning tobacco kills, and even brief exposure to it can cause harm. The April issue of Mayo Clinic Women’s…
5 April 2007
NewsSecond-hand smoke linked to long-term harm
Results of a new study provide more evidence that exposure to second-hand smoke has long-term adverse effects on respiratory health, and reaffirms the benefits of banning smoking in public places, researchers say. As…
7 September 2006
