Prenatal syphilis screening rates: Are they being accurately reported?

Key points
- Prenatal syphilis screening, recommended by the Centers for Disease Control, medical professional organizations, and public health authorities, is critical to preventing still births and serious birth defects in babies of affected mothers.
- Researchers led by Marc Rosenman, M.D., of the Indiana University School of Medicine and the Regenstrief Institute compared four years of Medicaid data from the state of Indiana with data from the Regenstrief Medical Record System (RMRS) for women seen in Wishard Health Services.
- “What our study points out is that analyses based on Medicaid data might not tell the whole story.
- Our findings add perspective to a CDC-funded study of Florida Medicaid data which reported a prenatal syphilis screening rate of about 50 percent, a rate very similar to what we found in Indiana Medicaid data,” said Dr.
Prenatal syphilis screening, recommended by the Centers for Disease Control, medical professional organizations, and public health authorities, is critical to preventing still births and serious birth defects in babies of affected mothers. A study published in the April issue of the journal Sexually Transmitted Diseases reports that state Medicaid statistics, when used to determine screening rates, may seriously underestimate the number of expectant mothers being screened for syphilis.
Researchers led by Marc Rosenman, M.D., of the Indiana University School of Medicine and the Regenstrief Institute compared four years of Medicaid data from the state of Indiana with data from the Regenstrief Medical Record System (RMRS) for women seen in Wishard Health Services. Of the nearly 4,000 women with both Medicaid and RMRS data, only half had evidence of prenatal syphilis screening recorded in Medicaid claims data, while more than 99 percent had at least one laboratory report of syphilis screening recorded in the RMRS, indicating that Medicaid numbers were missing nearly half the women screened.
“What our study points out is that analyses based on Medicaid data might not tell the whole story. And this problem is not unique to Indiana.
Our findings add perspective to a CDC-funded study of Florida Medicaid data which reported a prenatal syphilis screening rate of about 50 percent, a rate very similar to what we found in Indiana Medicaid data,” said Dr. Rosenman, an assistant professor of pediatrics at the IU School of Medicine and a research scientist at the Regenstrief Institute.
Why are Medicaid data incomplete? Reasons may vary from how the test is billed to how data are transmitted from a physician’s office, clinic or hospital to a state agency.
“Prenatal syphilis screening is a vital step in preventing serious illness. The nearly universal prenatal screening we report is not necessarily typical of other health systems across the state and nation, for a variety of reasons including that this study was conducted at a large public teaching hospital and began during a major syphilis outbreak in Indianapolis in 1998-1999, and since then physicians, health systems, and the county health department have probably all been extra conscientious in encouraging screening. But what is clear is that Medicaid data by far underestimate how much screening is taking place,” said Dr. Rosenman. “The same is probably true of other published estimates based on commercial insurance data.”
Syphilis, a sexually transmitted disease, is on the increase in the United States. A simple blood test is used to screen for the disease. An at-risk woman should be screened for syphilis multiple times during her pregnancy including immediately prior to delivery.
###
The CDC has called for the elimination of syphilis. See cdc.gov/stopsyphilis/.
Dr. Rosenman’s study was funded by the CDC and the Association of American Medical Colleges. Co-authors are Guoyu Tao, Ph.D., of the CDC; Kinga A. Szucs, M.D., of the IU School of Medicine; Jianhong Wang, Ph.D., and Roberta Ambuehl of the Regenstrief Institute; and Barbara E. Mahon M.D., M.P.H, formerly with the IU School of Medicine and the Boston University Schools of Public Health and Medicine, now with Novartis Vaccines.
Written and revised by
David Cohen, M.D.
Our doctors write and review articles for accuracy and keep them up to date.
health.am provides general information, not medical advice. Always consult a qualified health professional about your own health.
Explore health topics
More in this topic
Sexual Health →
NewsScreening and treating girls doesn't reduce prevalence of chlamydia in teens
Frequent testing and treatment of infection does not reduce the prevalence of chlamydia in urban teenage girls, according to a long term study by Indiana University School of Medicine researchers published in the…
9 January 2010
NewsSyphilis outbreak may be sign of re-emergence
An epidemic of syphilis in Jefferson County, Alabama, between 2005 and 2007 involved large increases in cases among heterosexuals, a population in which rates of infection had previously been falling, according to a new…
12 May 2009
NewsMale circumcision reduces risk of genital herpes and HPV infection, but not syphilis
Heterosexual men who undergo medical circumcision can significantly reduce their risk of acquiring two common sexually transmitted infections-herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2), the cause of genital herpes, and human…


