Adverse effects on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism
Andrey Nailor, M.D.·Published 10 June 2010·12 min read
Key points
It is widely known that hormonal contraceptives( HCs) use can lead to an impairment of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism which are important risk factors for cardiovascular diseases.
These effects occur with progestin-only contraceptives as well as with contraceptives containing estrogens.
The early deterioration of glucose tolerance could be due to a direct action of estrogen on the pancreas, where specific estrogen receptors have been identified.
These effects may be explained by the action of estrogens on insulin and glucagon: estrogen inhibit the secretion of glucagon On the other hand, progestins augment insulin and glucagon secretion without modifying their ratio in the portal vein (1,2).
It is widely known that hormonal contraceptives( HCs) use can lead to an impairment of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism which are important risk factors for cardiovascular diseases.
These effects occur with progestin-only contraceptives as well as with contraceptives containing estrogens. HCs may interfere with glucose metabolism, in part by creating an effect of peripheral insulin resistance and in part by diminishing the insulin-secreting capacities of the islets of Langerhans. It is shown that deterioration of glucose tolerance in the 1st trimester of oral contraceptives use is due to the synthetic estrogen, while hyperinsulinism after 6th month of use is due to the progestin component.
The early deterioration of glucose tolerance could be due to a direct action of estrogen on the pancreas, where specific estrogen receptors have been identified. The reduction of glucose levels by estrogen is due to reduction of glucogenolysis with an increase of hepatic gluconeogenesis.
These effects may be explained by the action of estrogens on insulin and glucagon: estrogen inhibit the secretion of glucagon On the other hand, progestins augment insulin and glucagon secretion without modifying their ratio in the portal vein (1,2). Hyperinsulinism is observed in women using combined hormonal contraceptives(COC) or progestins only, whether or not there is a deterioration of glucose tolerance.
This effect which can appear after 3 months of use, continues as long as HCs are used. The determinations of insulin secretion are more reliable if peptide C in plasma is determined, as it is released by the pancreas in an equimolar amount with insulin and is not retained by the liver. The hyperinsulinism is due to a hypersecretion and not to a diminution in degradation of insulin. So, probable pill-induced insulin resistance is comparable to that of pregnancy(1,2,3).
Although all progestins used in contraception, potentially, induce insulin resistance with hyperinsulinism, the effect seems to be largely dependent on the type of progestin used and are more marked with 19 nortestosterone derivatives than with 17 alpha hydroxy proge sterone, because of the structural similarity of 19 norsteroids (4). The most notable changes seem are seen with Levonorgestrel (LNG), mono or triphasic, and are minimal with the low-dose COC containing third-generation progestins (desogestrel and gestodene) (5,6,7). {embed="ref/stat-menu-obgyn2"}
In fact, was reported that women taking triphasic combined oral contraceptives develop, after three months from the start of the treatment ,a significant increase of the plasma glucose concentration and the plasma insulin response to oral glucose. While, fasting plasma cholesterol ,HDL-cholesterol and LDL- cholesterol concentrations did not change as compared with baseline values, nor did the ratio of total cholesterol to HDL-cholesterol. While plasma triglyceride levels increased significantly. The effects of HCs on serum lipid levels depend on the dose of estrogen and dose and type of progestin.
Written and revised by
Andrey Nailor, M.D.
Our doctors write and review articles for accuracy and keep them up to date.
health.am provides general information, not medical advice. Always consult a qualified health professional about your own health.
Generally, ethinylestradiol (EE)causes an increase in triglycerides and HDL-cholesterol, while progestins tend to increase total cholesterol and decrease HDL-cholesterol. The evaluation of impact on lipid and carbohydrate profiles of two combined oral contraceptives containing 20 mcg EE/ 100 mcg LNG and 30 mcg EE/ 150 mcg LNG showed similar effects for both preparations. Although the changes in the 20 EE group were lower compared with the 30 EE group, none of the differences between the two treatments were statistically significant(8,9).
So, low-dose combined HCs seem to have slight or no effect on cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides but there are only minimal differences with the higher doses pill. Low-dose progestin-only pill, may have deleterious effects.
Insulin-dependent diabetes in adolescents is a relative contraindication. Were investigated the eventual different effects of non hormonal contraception(NHC), combination oral contraception (COC), and depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) on lipids, in women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus(GDM).
This observational cohort study of 972 nondiabetic, normotensive, postpartum women showed that DMPA users gained significantly more weight compared with NHC and combined HC users(P < 0.0001). Patterns of change in LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides were not significantly different among groups. HDL cholesterol change differed only between COC and NHC groups (10). {pagebreak}
The effects of combined oral contraceptives containing low-dose ethinylestradiol associated with norethisterone,levonorgestrel or gestodene compared to copper IUDs were also evaluated in 103 women with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus(IDDM) or previous gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). None of these women developed microalbuminuria during the study. Compared to normal women, was found reduced insulin sensitivity in the women with previous GDM using the pill(10). So,COCs can be used in women with uncomplicated diabetes and in women with previous gestational diabetes, if clinical and monitoring can be ensured. Type 1 diabetes mellitus is common in Europeans. Glucometabolic control at conception and during early pregnancy is necessary to reduce the risk of early miscarriage and congenital malformations.
Safe and effective contraceptive methods are essential for these women in order to have a "planned pregnancy" under optimal conditions. Many teens lacke awareness of pregnancy-related complications with diabetes and are unaware about preconception counselling(PC). {embed="ref/stat-menu-obgyn2"}
The role of PC is focused to prevent complications for women with diabetes and to offer then a highly effective birth control method for preventing an unplanned pregnancy (11,12). So, women with diabetes need safe, effective contraception. Although intrauterine devices provide available contraception, concerns remain that progestin absorbed systemically from the levonorgestrel-releasing device may impair carbohydrate metabolism.
A recent randomized study examines the effect of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system on glucose metabolism in 62 women with uncomplicated insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The women were randomly assigned to either a levonorgestrel-releasing or a copper T 380A intrauterine device. Outcome data were available for 29 women using the levonorgestrel-releasing and 30 using the copper device.
At 12 months, mean glycosylated levels were similar for both groups. The same was registered for mean fasting-serum glucose levels and daily insulin doses (35.1 units compared with 36.4 units). No important differences were noted at either 6 weeks or 6 months(13). So, levonorgestrel-releasing device had no adverse effect on glucose metabolism, even at the 6-week observation when systemic levels of levonorgestrel would have been higher than at later observations(13). Concern about a potential adverse effect of this contraceptive on glucose control is unwarranted, and its use in women with diabetes should be liberalized.
Another open-label, randomized study compared the influence on the lipid profile of two oral contraceptives containing 30 mcg EE /3 mg drospirenone (DRSP) and 30 mcg EE/ 150 mcg desogestrel (DSG). A slight increase in mean total HDL cholesterol was found for both groups, after 13 treatment cycles ; whereas, HDL2 cholesterol did not change remarkably in both groups. The mean LDL cholesterol values increased by 10.6% in the DSG group and remained nearly stable in the DRSP group(+1.8%).
A slight rise in mean total cholesterol was found for all cycles after the initiation of treatment. The mean increase after 1 year of treatment was approximately 8% in both treatment groups. Mean triglyceride levels increased for both treatment groups. For total phospholipids, an increase of +13.6% (DRSP) and +18.5% (DSG) over 13 cycles was measured. In conclusion, the combined oral contraceptive EE/DRSP, as well as the reference preparation, had little impact on the lipid profile(14).
Similar results of drospirenone were obtained analyzing the effects on lipid metabolism of a preparation containing 30mcgEE/ 2mg chlormadinone acetate(CMA)over a period lasting 12 cycles. The effects on the lipoproteins checked were favorable,as the atherogenic index LDL/ HDL dropped from 2.2 prior to therapy to 1.7 in 12th cycle of the treatment period. There was a significant increase in cholesterol and triglycerides, while the LDL fraction remained almost constant as for EE / DRSP.
The antiandrogenic activity of the formulations containing EE/DRSP and EE/CMA may be regarded as responsible for the stable LDL cholesterol levels.
As a result, the atherogenic index, ratio of total HDL/LDL was increased, a pattern that is usually considered clinically beneficial with respect to cardiovascular disease risk (15,16). The observed changes were not suggestive of a clinically relevant deterioration of carbohydrate metabolism. The effects of Norplant compared with medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and low-dose oral contraceptive pill in diabetic women were evaluated. {pagebreak}
From this study emerged that DMPA and combined formulation-pill fasting blood sugar,while total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol decreased in all groups except DMPA where it increased. Triglyceride only increased in pill-group. HDL-cholesterol increased with the pill and decreased with Norplant and DMPA. Partial thromboplastin time was prolonged in Norplant users(17).
Therfore, Norplant use results in minimal metabolic alterations, while DMPA seems to have unfavorable outcome. The vaginal hormone-releasing system (15 mcg EE,120 mcg Etonogestrel) showed in women with type- 1 diabetes, no clinically significant effects on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism with neutral impact on the hemostasis system(18,19,20).
{embed="ref/stat-menu-obgyn2"}
Current evidence suggests that hormonal contraceptives have limited effect on carbohydrate metabolism and glucose tolerance in HC-users, but women with diabetic risk factors may be more sensitive to the vascular impact of these formulations than others. However,strong statements cannot be made, though, due to having few studies that compared any particular types of contraceptives. Many trials had small numbers of participants and some had large losses to follow up.
Most studies had poor reporting of methods. No information was available regarding the effects among women who were overweight (21). Obese women should undergo an endocrinologic and metabolic examination, in the interest of general prevention, before receiving a prescription for combined hormonal contraceptives(22). Long-term studies do not indicate any trend toward diabetes in long-term users and long-term use of COCs does not appear to increase the risk of cardiovascular disease.
Either the estrogen-induced deterioration of glucose tolerance or the progestin-induced insulin resistance can lead to poor glucose tolerance or type 2 diabetes mellitus in few predisposed individuals. Considering that all HCs potentially, may induce some deterioration of glucose in the tolerance tests and increase in insulin secretion, although these changes were within normal accepted levels, accurate contraceptive counselling is necessary.
In addition, it is important to remember that glucose intolerance developed during pill use is not always reversible. In women with diabetes mellitus it is very important to take in account such factors as type of the diabetes, its lasting, degree of metabolic compensation, presence of diabetes complications, body-mass index of the patient and, presence of risk factors for cardiovascular diseases and future pregnancy planning(23).
Women with diabetes need safe,effective contraception. Condom may be an acceptable method for some women but a high risk of user failure can be predicted. While,IUD or hormonal contraceptives may be the only reversible alternative(24,25).
Combined hormonal contraceptives can have deleterious effects on serum lipids, although only persons predisposed to hyperlipidemia are truly at risk. Concern about a potential adverse effect on glucose control of the contraceptive use in women with uncomplicated diabetes is non realistic.
So, hormonal contraception use is appropriate and convenient for women with controlled diabetes type 1 and 2 who do not smoke and who do not have other risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. In fact, acute myocardial infarction may occur in young women taking hormonal contraceptives who have poor metabolic state(26). It is advisable in these cases prescribe low-dose HC (pill or vaginal ring) or combination containing progestins with moderate antiandrogenic activity. {pagebreak}
In diabetic women who smoke, and in women with type 1 diabetes levonorgestrel –intrauterine device should be liberalized. To take in account the integration with diabetes control(medical or dietetic) and a weight control are mandatory. Particularly, primary preconception counseling for type 1 diabetes is convenient might be performed in the adolescent patients (27,28,29).
Elkind-Hirsch, K., Goldzieher, J.W. (1994). Metabolism:carbohydrate metabolism.In : Goldzieher, J.W., Fotherby, K.editors. Pharmacology of contraceptive steroids.New York, USA:Raven Press, p.345-56.
Sheu, W.H., Hsu, C.H.,Chen, Y.S., Jeng, C.Y., Fuh, M.M. (1994). Prospective evaluation of insulin resistance and lipid metabolism in women receiving oral contraceptives.Clin. Endocrinol,(Oxf) 40(2), 249-55.
Godsland, I.F.,Crook, D., Simpson, R. (1990). The effects of different formulations of oral contraceptives agents on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. N.Engl.J.Med, 323,1375-81.
Rubio-Lotvin, B. (1996).Oral hormonal contraceptives and carbohydrate metabolism. Ginecol. Obstet. Mex, 64, 198-200.
Crook, D.,Godsland, I.F.,Worhington, M., Felron, C.V., Proudler, A.J., Stevenson, J.C. (1993). A comparative metabolic study of two low-estrogen dose oral contraceptives containing desogestrel or gestodene progestins.Am.J.Obstet.Gynecol, 169,1183-9.
Petersen, K.R., Skouby, S.O., Jepsen, P.V., Haaber, A.B. (1996). Diabetes regulation and oral contraceptives.Lipoprotein metabolism in women with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus using oral contraceptives. Ugerskr. Laeger, 158(17),2388-92.
Endrikat, J., Klipping, C., Cronin, M., Gerlinger, C., Ruebig, A., Schmidt, W., Dusterberg, B. (2002).An open label, comparative study of the effects of a dose-reduced oral contraceptive containing 20 microg ethinyl estradiol and 100 microg levonorgestrel on hemostatic, lipids, and carbohydrate metabolism variables. Contraception, Mar, 65(3), 215-21.
Skouby, S.O., Endrikat, J., Dusterberg, B., Schmidt, W., Gerlinger, C., Wessel, J., Goldstein, H., Jespersen, J. (2005). A 1-year randomized study to evaluate the effects of a dose reduction in oral contraceptives on lipids and carbohydrate metabolism: 20 microg ethinyl estradiol combined with 100 microg levonorgestrel. Contraception, Feb, 71(2), 111-7.
Xiang, A.H., Kawakubo, M., Buchanan, T.A., Kjos, S.L. (2007). A longitudinal study of lipids and blood pressure in relation to method of contraception in Latino women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care, 30(8), 1952-8.
Petersen, K.R., Skouby, S.O., Jespersen, J. (1996). Contraception guidance in women with pre-existing disturbances in carbohydrate metabolism.Eur.J.Contracept.Reprod.HealthCare, 1(1), 53-9.
Charron-Prochownik, D., Sereika, S.M., Wang, S.L., Hannan, M.F., Fischl, A.R., Stewart, S.H., Dean-McElhinny, T. (2006).Reproductive health and preconception counseling awareness in adolescents with diabetes: what they don't know can hurt them. Diabetes Educ, Mar-Apr, 32(2), 235-42.
Rogovskaya, S., Rivera, R., Grimes, D.A., Chen, P.L., Pierre-Louis, B., Prilepskaya, V., Kulakov, V. (2005).Effect of a levonorgestrel intrauterine system on women with type 1 diabetes: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol, Apr, 105(4), 811-5.
Gaspard, U., Endrikat, J., Desager, J.P., Buicu, C., Gerlinger, C., Heithecker, R. (2004). A randomized study on the influence of oral contraceptives containing ethinylestradiol combined with drospirenone or desogestrel on lipid and lipoprotein metabolism over a period of 13 cycles. Contraception, 69(4), 271-8.
Cirkel, U., Belkien, L., Hanker, J.P., Schweppe, K.W., Schneider, H.P. (1986). Effects of a chlormadinone acetate-containing ovulation inhibitor on androgenization pictures and liver and lipid metabolism in young females. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd, Jul, 46(7), 439-43
Zahradnik, H.P., Hanjalic Beck, A. (2008). Efficacy, safety and sustainability of treatment continuation and results of an oral contraceptive containing 30 mcg ethinylestradiol and 2 mg chlormadinone acetate, in long-term usage (up to 45 cycles)-an open label, prospective, noncontrolled, office-based Phase III study. Contraception, 77(5), 337-43.
Diab, K.M., Zaki, M.M. (2000). Contraception in diabetic women:comparative metabolic study of Norplant, depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate,low-dose oral contraceptive pill and CuT 380A. J.Obstet.Gynecol.Res, 26(1), 17-26.
Grigoryan, O.R., Grodnitskaya, E.E., Andreeva, E.N.,Chebotnikova, T.V., Melnichenko, G.A. (2008). Use of the NuvaRing hormone-releasing system in late reproductive-age women with type 1 diabetes mellitus . Gynecol.Endocrinol, 24(2), 99-104.
Tuppurainem, M. (2004). The combined contraceptive vaginal ring and lipid metabolism:a comparative study.Contraception, 69,389-94
Duijkers, I. (2004). A comparative study on the effects of a contraceptive vaginal ring and an oral contraceptive on carbohydrate metabolism and adrenal and thyroid function. Eur. J.Contracept.Reprod.Health Care, 9, 131-40.
Lopez, L.M., Grimes, D.A., Schulz, K.F. (2007). Steroidal contraceptives: effect on carbohydrate metabolism in women without diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,Apr, 18,(2), CD006133.
Gaspard, U. (1988).Oral contraception, glucid metabolism and monitoring criteria. Contracept. Fertil. Sex(Paris),16(2), 113-
Nikolov, A., Dimitrov, A., Kolarov, G., Todarova, K., Mekhandzhiev, T.S. (2005). Contraception in women with diabetes mellitus. Akush Ginekol(Sofia), 44(5), 47-52
Skouby, S.O., Molsted-Pedersen, L., Petersen, K.R. (1991). Contraception for women with diabetes:an update. Baillieres Clin.Obstet.Gynaecol, 5(2), 493-503.
Falsetti, D.,Charron-Prochownik, D., Serelka, S., Kitutu, J., Peterson, K., Becker, D., Jacober, S., Mansfield, J.,White, N.H. (2003). Condom use,pregnancy,and STDs in adolescent females with and without type 1 diabetes.Diabetes Educ, 29(1), 135-43.
Rogowicz, A., Zozulinska, D., Wierusz-Wysocka, B. (2007). Myocardial infarction in a 26-year old patient with diabetes type 1. Kardiol. Pol, 65(11), 1363-6.
Klinke, J., Toth, E. L. (2003). Preconception care for women with type 1 diabetes. Can.Fam.Physician, 49, 769-73.
Diabetes and Pregnancy Grroup. (2005). Knowledge about preconception care in French women with type 1 diabetes.Diabetes Metab, 31(5), 443-7.
Charron-Prochownik, D., Sereika, S.M., Wang, S.L., Hannan, M.F., Fischi, A.R., Stewart, S.H., Dean – McElhinny, T. (2006). Reproductive health and preconception counseling awareness in adolescents with diabetes: what they don't know can hurt them.Diabetes Educ, 32(2), 235-42.