Investigating a patient with erectile dysfunction: Is it really necessary?

Key points
- The National Institute of Health defined erectile dysfunction as the persistent inability to achieve and/or to maintain an erection for a satisfactory sexual performance.
- Aetiology of erectile dysfunction can be classified as organic, psychogenic or mixed.
- First level diagnostic tests, including anamnesis, validated questionnaire, routine laboratory tests and hormonal profile seem enough to make an aetiological diagnosis of erectile dysfunction and to identify and remove any erectile dysfunction (ED) risk factors in most cases.
- Second level diagnostic evaluation includes specialistic instrumental exams that can be helpful for accurate aetiological diagnosis of erectile dysfunction.
The National Institute of Health defined erectile dysfunction as the persistent inability to achieve and/or to maintain an erection for a satisfactory sexual performance. Erectile dysfunction must be considered a public health problem for its high prevalence worldwide.
Aetiology of erectile dysfunction can be classified as organic, psychogenic or mixed. Erectile dysfunction must be considered the first sign of many diseases. Thus, a correct diagnostic approach is essential before starting an effective therapeutic regimen. Current guidelines concerning management of erectile dysfunction agree on the great importance of anamnesis as being the basis of a correct diagnosis of erectile deficit.
First level diagnostic tests, including anamnesis, validated questionnaire, routine laboratory tests and hormonal profile seem enough to make an aetiological diagnosis of erectile dysfunction and to identify and remove any erectile dysfunction (ED) risk factors in most cases. First level tests should be performed, so than urologists can accurately diagnose ED and prescribe relevant treatment.
Second level diagnostic evaluation includes specialistic instrumental exams that can be helpful for accurate aetiological diagnosis of erectile dysfunction. These exams, including Penile dynamic colour-duplex.
Doppler ultrasonography, nocturnal penile tumescence recording, cavernosometry/cavernosography and neurological investigation, should be performed when first level diagnostic assessment is not clear, when the presence of an underlying organic pathology should be excluded in young patients with persistent ED, when veno-occlusive or neurogenic ED is suspected and when a better definition of the disease is needed.
Keywords: Diagnostic tests, Doppler ultrasonography, erectile dysfunction, nocturnal penile tumescence recording, penile dynamic colour-duplex
Mirone Vincenzo
Via Pansini 5, Napoli, Italy
Correspondence Address:
Mirone Vincenzo
Via Pansini 5, Napoli
Italy
mirone@unina.it
Written and revised by
Gerald Hurowitz, M.D.
Our doctors write and review articles for accuracy and keep them up to date.
health.am provides general information, not medical advice. Always consult a qualified health professional about your own health.
Explore health topics
More in this topic
Sexual Health →
NewsMayo Clinic study finds younger men with erectile dysfunction at double risk of heart disease
Men who experience erectile dysfunction between the ages of 40 and 49 are twice as likely to develop heart disease than men without dysfunction, according to a new Mayo Clinic study. Researchers also found that men with…
3 February 2009
NewsErectile Dysfunction Treatment May Also Treat Blood Vessel Narrowing in Rheumatic Diseases
When used in addition to other treatments, tadalafil is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon, according to research presented this week at the American College of Rheumatology…
27 October 2008
NewsErectile dysfunction predicts heart problems: study
Problems with maintaining an erection may foretell heart trouble ahead for men with type 2 diabetes, two new studies show. A number of past studies have found a connection between erectile dysfunction (ED) and heart…

