Study contradicts USA warning that an antidepressant can cause congenital abnormalities

Key points
- A study carried out by German researchers has failed to show that a popular antidepressant, paroxetine, causes congenital abnormalities if taken by pregnant women, the 22nd annual conference of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology heard.
- Dr Wolfgang Paulus said the results were important because they contradicted a warning issued by the US Food and Drug Administration in October 2005 that the use of paroxetine (brand names: Seroxat, Paxil, Aropax, Deroxat or Pondera) could increase the risk of major congenital abnormalities.
- Dr Paulus, director of the Institute of Reproductive Toxicology at the University of Ulm, Germany, told a news briefing: "Our results show the importance of a reliable pharmaco-vigilance system documenting foetal outcome after medication in pregnancy.
- The FDA warning about the drug, which is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), was issued on the basis of unpublished research.
A study carried out by German researchers has failed to show that a popular antidepressant, paroxetine, causes congenital abnormalities if taken by pregnant women, the 22nd annual conference of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology heard.
Dr Wolfgang Paulus said the results were important because they contradicted a warning issued by the US Food and Drug Administration in October 2005 that the use of paroxetine (brand names: Seroxat, Paxil, Aropax, Deroxat or Pondera) could increase the risk of major congenital abnormalities. The warning may have caused women to terminate their pregnancies unnecessarily.
Dr Paulus, director of the Institute of Reproductive Toxicology at the University of Ulm, Germany, told a news briefing: "Our results show the importance of a reliable pharmaco-vigilance system documenting foetal outcome after medication in pregnancy. We need international networks of registries to do this, but financial support for this purpose is lacking. We hope for more serious efforts from the pharmaceutical industry and governmental authorities in Europe. We think that this is also an ethical challenge because many patients opt for termination of pregnancy due to fear of congenital malformations.
The FDA warning about the drug, which is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), was issued on the basis of unpublished research. "It showed that the absolute rate of major congenital malformations seen in the first trimester for paroxetine users was 4%, and 2% for cardiovascular malformations. Yet the retrospective study of 5,956 women by the producer, GlaxoSmithKline, had only 591 cases of medication with paroxetine during the first trimester and did not include controls of women not taking an antidepressant," he said.*
In contrast, the research carried out by Dr Paulus and his colleagues was a prospective follow-up study that collected data on pregnancy outcomes after medication with paroxetine in 119 women between 1990 and 2005. "Our national Teratology Information Service (TIS) was contacted by physicians and patients after exposure to paroxetine in the first trimester of pregnancy. We compared the results with a control group of 645 women over the same period of time, who had not been exposed, or not severely exposed, to the drug.
"We found that the rate of congenital abnormalities was not increased after using paroxetine in early pregnancy. Three abnormalities were reported after exposure to paroxetine: club feet after exposure throughout pregnancy, a large port wine mark after exposure up to the seventh week, and spastic torticollis (painful spasms of the neck muscles) after exposure in the first twelve weeks. However, in the non-paroxetine group there was a similar rate of abnormalities, with 25 out of 557 babies affected."
However, the researchers did find that the number of women deciding to terminate their pregnancies was much higher amongst the paroxetine group. "Eighteen out of 119 paroxetine users (just over 15%) preferred termination of pregnancy compared to 17 out of 645 women in the control group (2.6%). In most cases the patients opted for termination of pregnancy because of a combination of reasons: partly because of their depression, but also because of confusion caused by information on possible damage to the foetus from the package labelling.
Written and revised by
David Cohen, M.D.
Our doctors write and review articles for accuracy and keep them up to date.
health.am provides general information, not medical advice. Always consult a qualified health professional about your own health.
Explore health topics
More in this topic
Mental Health →
NewsA calculator to estimate the likelihood of antidepressant response
As in any other field of medicine, when a depressed person visits a psychiatrist for treatment of depression, they like to be informed of the odds that they will respond to the medication they are prescribed.…
2 July 2013
NewsCompound enhances SSRI antidepressant's effects in mice
A synthetic compound is able to turn off "secondary" vacuum cleaners in the brain that take up serotonin, resulting in the "happy" chemical being more plentiful, scientists from the School of Medicine at The University…
22 June 2013
NewsDo antidepressants impair the ability to extinguish fear?
An interesting new report of animal research published in Biological Psychiatry suggests that common antidepressant medications may impair a form of learning that is important clinically. Selective serotonin reuptake…




