Doctors overuse heart treatment, despite guidelines

Key points
- The controversial use of stents days after a heart attack has continued unabated in the United States, even after a landmark study and new guidelines said the pricey therapy does not help patients.
- Just over half of patients who have survived at least 24 hours after a heart attack will have a stent - a small metal mesh tube - placed to open a blocked coronary artery, and that rate has not changed from 2005 through 2008.
- The findings add to concerns about overuse of the heart devices, made by companies such as Boston Scientific, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Inc and Johnson & Johnson.
- Stenting procedures cost the United States about $12 billion every year, and researchers say it is time doctors take responsibility for the nation's spiraling health costs.
The controversial use of stents days after a heart attack has continued unabated in the United States, even after a landmark study and new guidelines said the pricey therapy does not help patients.
Just over half of patients who have survived at least 24 hours after a heart attack will have a stent - a small metal mesh tube - placed to open a blocked coronary artery, and that rate has not changed from 2005 through 2008.
The findings add to concerns about overuse of the heart devices, made by companies such as Boston Scientific, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Inc and Johnson & Johnson.
Stenting procedures cost the United States about $12 billion every year, and researchers say it is time doctors take responsibility for the nation's spiraling health costs.
"I think physicians have to rise to the challenge," said Dr. Judith Hochman, a cardiologist at New York University, who led the new work.
In 2006, Hochman published a study known as the Occluded Artery Trial showing that stents did not prevent any deaths or new heart attacks compared with drugs alone when inserted more than 24 hours after a heart attack into a totally blocked artery.
While the people who got stents did not experience any more side effects, the devices did rack up an extra $7,000 in net cost per person after two years, Hochman later found.
"After a day or so, whatever damage is going to be done was done already," she told Reuters Health. "The message is to seek medical care soon after a heart attack, and that is when stenting really helps."
Hochman's results became part of revised guidelines from the American Heart Association and other groups in 2007, which recommend against using stents more than 24 hours after a heart attack in stable patients.
Her new study, published in the Archives of Internal Medicine (bit.ly/7qXyI), is based on nearly 29,000 patients seen at 896 U.S. hospitals.
It shows that neither the 2006 trial nor the revised guidelines had a noticeable effect on stent use.
"Overall there was no change in practice," Hochman said. "I expected to see a change, so it was a big surprise and a disappointment."
600,000 STENTS A YEAR
Hochman's findings apply to about 100,000 Americans a year, suggesting that about 50,000 people are having the $20,000 procedure done unnecessarily every year.
That is in addition to thousands of stents inserted outside the context of emergencies such as a heart attack, according to a study from last week showing at least one in 12 of those procedures probably leads to more harm than benefit.
Each year in the United States, about 600,000 stents are inserted into ailing hearts where they prop open blocked arteries.
Written and revised by
Gerald Hurowitz, M.D.
Our doctors write and review articles for accuracy and keep them up to date.
health.am provides general information, not medical advice. Always consult a qualified health professional about your own health.
Explore health topics
More in this topic
Heart & Blood Vessels →
NewsBlack heart attack patients wait longer for advanced treatment, University of Michigan study shows
Black patients having a heart attack wait longer at hospitals than white patients to get advanced procedures that will restore blood flow to their hearts, according to a University of Michigan Health System study. The…
22 June 2011
NewsDoctors rush to heart procedure before proven drugs
Fewer than half of Americans with stable heart disease get guideline-recommended medicines before being rushed off for an invasive heart procedure, researchers said Tuesday. Yet the costly procedure, called percutaneous…
12 May 2011
NewsIncrease in Evidence-Based Treatments Followed by Decreased Risk of Death in Heart Attack Patients
In an analysis of data from a coronary care registry in Sweden, between 1996-2007 there was an increase in the prevalence of use of evidence-based invasive procedures and pharmacological therapies for treatment of a…




