Just how low should blood sugar go?

Key points
- Conventional thinking among doctors who treat people with type 2 diabetes has been the lower the blood sugar levels, the better.
- A massive study of diabetics with a high risk of heart disease known as ACCORD has found that lowering blood sugar levels to what is considered normal for healthy people proved deadly for some, researchers said on Wednesday.
- Older patients who underwent intensive therapy to reach that level had higher rates of death than a group of patients in the same study who were treated more conservatively.
- "The study was designed asking the question if you really control blood sugar, do you actually prevent death?" said Dr.
Conventional thinking among doctors who treat people with type 2 diabetes has been the lower the blood sugar levels, the better.
Many doctors are now taking a second look.
A massive study of diabetics with a high risk of heart disease known as ACCORD has found that lowering blood sugar levels to what is considered normal for healthy people proved deadly for some, researchers said on Wednesday.
Older patients who underwent intensive therapy to reach that level had higher rates of death than a group of patients in the same study who were treated more conservatively.
"The study was designed asking the question if you really control blood sugar, do you actually prevent death?" said Dr. Faramarz Ismail-Beigi of the University Hospitals Case Medical Center in Cleveland, Ohio, one of the study's researchers.
"I think in the intensive group, the answer is no. It doesn't prevent heart attacks and stroke," he said.
Patients in the intensive treatment group of the ACCORD study were aiming for a hemoglobin A1c level - a standard measure of blood sugar - of 6 percent or below. They achieved an average of 6.4 percent, whereas the more conservative treatment group had A1c levels of about 7.5 percent.
"We can move millions of people into this zone with a certain amount of resources," Ismail-Beigi said. To move them all down to 6, you would need five to 10 times more resources. In terms of public health, it makes a huge difference."
Dr. James Dove, president of the American College of Cardiology, said the study was a bit unsettling.
"I think it offers some concern and caution," Dove said in a telephone interview. "The standard theory has been the lower the blood sugar the better off it was for the patient in decreasing the side effects of diabetes."
Researchers at the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, which funded and organized the ACCORD trial, said they will study why patients in the aggressive arm of the study fared worse.
By Julie Steenhuysen
Written and revised by
David Cohen, M.D.
Our doctors write and review articles for accuracy and keep them up to date.
health.am provides general information, not medical advice. Always consult a qualified health professional about your own health.
Explore health topics
More in this topic
Diabetes & Hormones →
NewsLittle evidence soy helps blood sugar control
Soy foods and supplements probably don't help control high blood sugar, according to a new report. Some clinical trials have linked soy to better blood sugar control. But for the new study, researchers combined the…
10 March 2011
NewsFruit salad and blood sugar meters don't mix
Listen up, diabetics: invisible bits of fruit on your hands can mess up your finger-prick blood tests, making your blood sugar level look higher than it really is. That's because sugars from fruit will stay on your…
10 February 2011
NewsLife's Simple 7 – Step#6: Reduce Blood Sugar
The American Heart Association considers diabetes one of the six major controllable risk factors for cardiovascular disease. In fact, adults with diabetes are two to four times more likely to have heart disease or a…
10 February 2011



