Inadequate access to opioid-based pain relief is a human rights issue for cancer patients

Key points
- Many cancer patients in Europe are being denied access to adequate pain relief because of over-zealous regulations restricting the availability and accessibility of opioid-based drugs such as morphine.
- Authors of the Europe-wide study say that restricting access to pain-killing drugs in this way is a breach of patients' human rights, and they conclude that "there is an ethical and public health imperative to address these issues vigorously and urgently".
- The study, which is published online in the cancer journal, Annals of Oncology [1] today (Monday 22 February), is a joint report on the availability and accessibility of opioids for the relief of cancer pain by the European Society for Medical Oncology and the European Association for Palliative Care.
- They found that in some countries, particularly in Western Europe, access and availability was good (the UK was an example of a country that performed well in this respect), but in other countries, particularly in Eastern Europe, it was much more restricted.
Many cancer patients in Europe are being denied access to adequate pain relief because of over-zealous regulations restricting the availability and accessibility of opioid-based drugs such as morphine.
Authors of the Europe-wide study say that restricting access to pain-killing drugs in this way is a breach of patients' human rights, and they conclude that "there is an ethical and public health imperative to address these issues vigorously and urgently".
The study, which is published online in the cancer journal, Annals of Oncology [1] today (Monday 22 February), is a joint report on the availability and accessibility of opioids for the relief of cancer pain by the European Society for Medical Oncology and the European Association for Palliative Care. The authors collected data from 21 Eastern European countries and 20 Western European countries.
They evaluated the lists of allowed opioid drugs for the management of strong pain (opioid analgesics) for each country, the cost of opioid medication to patients and the regulatory barriers that can make it more difficult, if not impossible, for cancer patients and their doctors to get access to these medications in a timely manner.
They found that in some countries, particularly in Western Europe, access and availability was good (the UK was an example of a country that performed well in this respect), but in other countries, particularly in Eastern Europe, it was much more restricted. In countries, such as Lithuania, Tajikistan, Belarus, Albania, Georgia and Ukraine, some essential opioid medicines were completely unavailable.
The authors say that in many countries the balance between enabling cancer patients to receive the pain relief that they need, while, at the same time, preventing prescription drugs being diverted for substance abuse in illicit drug markets, is weighted too much in favour of the latter.
They write: "Preventing drug abuse is important, but it should not hinder patients' ability to receive the care they need and deserve. This is the approach of the WHO [World Health Organization] and the INCB [International Narcotics Control Board] . . .Both recommend that opioids should be available for cancer patients at hospital and community levels and that physicians should be able to prescribe opioids according to the individual needs of each patient.
"While most governments allow physicians to prescribe opioids for patients, regulations vary among nations and in many countries, regulations to reduce substance abuse and to restrict the diversion of medicinal opioids into illicit markets unduly interfere with medical availability for the relief of pain."
Regulations that restrict opioid prescribing and which contravene WHO and INCB recommendations include: requiring special patient permits, limiting the authority of physicians to prescribe opioids even for cancer patients with strong pain, imposing arbitrary dose limits that limit the ability to adjust the dose to individual patient needs, imposing severe limits on the duration of the prescription (e.g. less than seven days' supply per prescription), restricting opioid dispensing so that it's harder for patients to access the medication, increasing bureaucratic burdens through the use of complex or poorly accessible prescription forms or complex reporting requirements, and intimidating health care providers and pharmacists with intimidatory legal sanctions.
Written and revised by
David Cohen, M.D.
Our doctors write and review articles for accuracy and keep them up to date.
health.am provides general information, not medical advice. Always consult a qualified health professional about your own health.
Explore health topics
More in this topic
Cancer →
NewsCommonly used painkillers may protect against skin cancer
A new study suggests that aspirin and other similar painkillers may help protect against skin cancer. Published early online in CANCER, a peer-reviewed journal of the American Cancer Society, the findings indicate that…
30 May 2012
NewsWomen need evidence-based balanced information on HRT
Millions of middle-aged women were needlessly denied HRT because a landmark report which found it raised the risk of breast cancer was exaggerated, while the benefits to middle-aged women were overlooked. Eluned Hughes,…
22 May 2012
NewsCancer Patients Pain Can Be Helped By Psychosocial Interventions
Researchers at Moffitt Cancer Center, who teamed with colleagues at five universities around the United States, analyzed past studies of cancer-related pain reduction and found that psychosocial interventions can have a…






