Cervical cancer care poorer at small centers

Key points
- Women with cervical cancer who get radiation therapy at small, local facilities are less likely to be treated effectively, researchers report.
- Invasive cervical cancer has become relatively rare in the US, with about 12,000 patients diagnosed with the disease each year, Dr.
- The researchers evaluated the care received by 442 women treated at 55 US centers between 1996 and 1999.
- The team estimates that, nationwide, half of the facilities treat an average of two or fewer patients with the disease each year.
Women with cervical cancer who get radiation therapy at small, local facilities are less likely to be treated effectively, researchers report.
Invasive cervical cancer has become relatively rare in the US, with about 12,000 patients diagnosed with the disease each year, Dr. Patricia J. Eifel and colleagues point out. On the other hand, they add, treatment has become complex, raising the issue of whether centers treating only a handful of patients each year have the skills and resources necessary to provide the best treatment.
The researchers evaluated the care received by 442 women treated at 55 US centers between 1996 and 1999. The centers were divided into two groups: those treating 500 or more cervical cancer patients each year, and those treating fewer than 500 patients annually.
The team estimates that, nationwide, half of the facilities treat an average of two or fewer patients with the disease each year.
Shorter, more aggressive courses of radiation are now understood to be more effective for treating invasive cervical cancer. However, Eifel - at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston - and her colleagues found that patients treated at the smaller facilities were more likely to get a relative low total radiation dose and to undergo prolonged treatment.
They also were more likely to have undergone hysterectomy and chemotherapy, both of which are not proven to aid in survival, according to the team's report in the medical journal Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.
Overall, the researchers conclude that "some small facilities may lack the resources needed to deliver optimal care to patients, and that they "should consider referring patients to larger facilities for treatment."
SOURCE: Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics; November 15, 2004.
Written and revised by
Gerald Hurowitz, M.D.
Our doctors write and review articles for accuracy and keep them up to date.
health.am provides general information, not medical advice. Always consult a qualified health professional about your own health.
Explore health topics
More in this topic
Cancer →
NewsMD Anderson guides intelligent redesign of cancer care delivery model
How best to implement key recommendations recently identified by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) for the delivery of high-quality cancer care is the focus of two peer-reviewed articles from The University of Texas MD…
6 February 2014
NewsInternational team completes systematic, genomic study of cervical cancer
Researchers from the Boston area, Mexico, and Norway have completed a comprehensive genomic analysis of cervical cancer in two patient populations. The study identified recurrent genetic mutations not previously found…
26 December 2013
NewsCancer diagnosis more likely to limit careers for patients from rural areas
Compared to their counterparts in cities, cancer patients living in rural areas tend to retire early after being diagnosed, and are less likely to go on paid disability leave while receiving treatment. These are some of…





